| Summary: | [META] GTK2 VCL backend bugs and enhancements | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) <philipz85> |
| Component: | LibreOffice | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | cno, fitojb, ilmari.lauhakangas |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | Inherited From OOo | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| See Also: |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103182 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102495 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32500 |
||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
| Bug Depends on: | 79872, 92630, 98038, 98040, 99150, 100539, 101798, 101860, 106898, 107574, 112347, 112830, 112834, 112846, 112890, 112931, 113294, 113353, 113890, 113891, 114203, 114239, 114407, 115106, 116039, 117384, 118499, 118807, 121356, 125982, 125985, 126717, 126914, 129401 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 112228 | ||
|
Description
Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired)
2016-10-25 20:21:46 UTC
I was under the impression that GTK+ 2 is going away; why is it worth to have a metabug for a dying technology? (In reply to Adolfo Jayme from comment #1) > I was under the impression that GTK+ 2 is going away; why is it worth to > have a metabug for a dying technology? TDF only builds against GTK+2 and the GTK+3 backend is still a work in progress, so GTK+2 will be around for a long time, and as such, it is more used and more tested. Please use this for issues that are exclusively related to the GTK2 backend. Gtk2 backend was dropped, so closing. |