Bug 141323

Summary: Font Color in "Internet Link" and "Visited Internet Link" Character styles does not apply to hyperlinks, and inconsistency between Options and Character Style labels
Product: LibreOffice Reporter: sdc.blanco
Component: UIAssignee: Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: normal CC: libreoffice-ux-advise
Priority: medium Keywords: needsUXEval
Version: 7.1.0.3 release   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
See Also: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141322
Whiteboard:
Crash report or crash signature: Regression By:
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 107733    

Description sdc.blanco 2021-03-29 12:10:18 UTC 
Actual:

1. Font color for hyperlinks is set in Tools > Options > LibreOffice > Application Colors.  (with labels "Visited Links" and "Unvisited Links")

2. All formatting attributes for these links can be set with "Visited Internet Link" and "Unvisited Internet Link" in Styles deck, except for Font Color.

3.  Placing the cursor on a link shows "Default Character Style" in Character Styles Deck.

Expected:

1.  Changing font color in Character Style for "Visited Internet Link" and "Unvisited Internet Link" should work, given that the other attributes can also be  applied.

2. Character Style for link should be highlighted in Styles Deck, when cursor is placed in link.

3. Labels in Options and in Character Style should be the same. 
(probably: "Visited Links" and "Unvisited Links")
Comment 1 sdc.blanco 2021-03-29 16:01:31 UTC 
(In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #0)
> 2. Character Style for link should be highlighted in Styles Deck, when
> cursor is placed in link.
bug 108170  

 - modifying summary
Comment 2 Heiko Tietze 2021-04-06 15:54:17 UTC 
Hyperlinks do use these character styles but the Stylist doesn't give proper feedback, see bug 108170 => DUP.

And it's possible to overwrite the CS color via Tools > Options > Application Colors. This makes sense to me considering HTML documents with "fancy" styling back in the early 0th.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 108170 ***