Bug 142746

Summary: Effect details loses focus after settings change
Product: LibreOffice Reporter: Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz1>
Component: ImpressAssignee: Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME    
Severity: minor CC: ilmari.lauhakangas, iskander.ojarow
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Crash report or crash signature: Regression By:
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 109362    
Attachments: Example file

Description Eyal Rozenberg 2021-06-09 18:38:39 UTC 
Occasionally, when you edit the details of an animation effect for some slide elements, the selection of elements is scrapped, and the effect details controls become grayed out, and the specific control you were working on loses focus.

I'm seeing this happen with multiple items selected, which are text lines within a box, and with an emphasis effect. Will try and find the time to provide exact reproduction instructions later on (assuming this is not a duplicate).
Comment 1 Iskander 2021-07-25 17:39:10 UTC 
Please provide steps for reproduction.
Comment 2 Eyal Rozenberg 2021-07-25 21:15:57 UTC 
(In reply to Iskander from comment #1)
> Please provide steps for reproduction.

If I were able to consistently reproduce it, I would provide those steps. I can just say that it happens working on presentations with > 5 effects on > 20 slides.
Comment 3 QA Administrators 2021-07-26 03:30:14 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 4 Buovjaga 2022-05-11 14:09:59 UTC 
Created attachment 180064 [details]
Example file

Here is an example file that fits the description.

Eyal: have you still seen the problem.

I could not reproduce with the file I created.

Arch Linux 64-bit
Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 5fe3202e99901d82b0df03e739f3a02b00441fda
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.17; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb)
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded Jumbo
Built on 11 May 2022
Comment 5 Eyal Rozenberg 2022-05-11 18:56:08 UTC 
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #4)
> Eyal: have you still seen the problem.

No, I can't reproduce this right now. Let's close it as WFM I guess.