| Summary: | When inserting a FOOTNOTE or ENDNOTE, allow user to chose an alternative anchor character style | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | R. Green <greenandpleasant2000-support> |
| Component: | Writer | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | libreoffice-ux-advise, mikekaganski, walt.tuvell |
| Priority: | medium | Keywords: | needsUXEval |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| See Also: |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136554 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145239 |
||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 113072 | ||
|
Description
R. Green
2021-07-19 10:35:20 UTC
I assume this needs design input, but I just wanted to flag that it is possible to right-click on the footnote/endnote character, select "Footnotes and Endnotes" (or got to "Tools > Footnotes and Endnotes"), and change the styles to any style available. I assume the issue R. Green describes here is that it is not possible to have different styles for different footnotes or different endnotes, right? (In reply to stragu from comment #1) >I assume the issue R. Green describes here is that it is not possible to >have different styles for different footnotes or different endnotes, right? Correct. The auto-numbering for footnotes has it limits. If varying CS are needed you can always add symbols manually. So besides the awkward workflow per Tools > F&E to modify Insert > Footnote my take is WF. Alternatively we could change the asterisk as suggested in bug 145239. The problem with U+1F7B6 is that not all fonts can show this symbol. What has room for improvements is the indication of CS in the Stylist. Meaning if the footnote anchor is selected I expect the respective CS to change. Does not happen. And you cannot change the CS on one footnote. Don't remember what ID this ticket was. Mike, what do you think about WF? Varying CS contradicts the idea of autonumbering where numbers have a reliable sequence. We better solve the double superscripted asterisk with a special rule (see also bug 145239). => WF |