| Summary: | Marker (arrow head) on enhanced-path in custom shape is wrong | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | Regina Henschel <rb.henschel> |
| Component: | Draw | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
| Status: | NEW --- | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | buzea.bogdan, xiscofauli |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 7.3.0.0 alpha0+ | ||
| Hardware: | x86-64 (AMD64) | ||
| OS: | Windows (All) | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 123648 | ||
| Attachments: |
Example file with four non-primitive custom-shapes
Example file with five non-primitive custom-shapes |
||
Created attachment 174907 [details]
Example file with five non-primitive custom-shapes
Correction: C is OK
E is wrong, because a closed path should not have markers regardless of other sub-paths in the same set.
Moving to NEW |
Created attachment 174906 [details] Example file with four non-primitive custom-shapes Open attached file. It contains four shapes and next to it the markup of the enhanced-path attribute. A is correct. The path is closed by command Z and therefore has no markers. B is wrong. The path is not closed but has only accidentally same coordinates in start and end point. It should show markers. This is a custom shape with an enhanced-path. The handling of polyline and polygon does not apply. C is wrong. The path is closed by command Z and therefore should show no markers. Difference to A is, that here exists a second sub-paths set (starting after the N command) that has a line. D is wrong. The path is not closed and therefore should show markers. It is the same as B but with an addition second sub-paths set with a line.