| Summary: | Calc | Writer | Implement tools Find and Replace as tool-bars | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | ricky.tigg |
| Component: | Writer | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | 79045_79045, libreoffice-ux-advise |
| Priority: | lowest | ||
| Version: | 7.2.5.2 release | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| See Also: | https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95405 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
| Attachments: | Writer | tool Find-and-replace floating window in minimal size | ||
|
Description
ricky.tigg
2022-01-28 09:16:10 UTC
Created attachment 177865 [details]
Writer | tool Find-and-replace floating window in minimal size
I didn't read it but let's call UX. Rephrasing in my words to make sure having the same understanding: Your problem is the F&R dialog covering the sheet on repeated replace operations. For some reason you don't want to run Find All/Replace All and the search results dialog is not helpful. The proposal is to put all controls of the F%R dialog in a toolbar. Serious drawback of this solution is a jumping UI. But let's consider a sidebar deck, see bug 95405. If you agree on this solution we could make your request a duplicate. - F&R dialogue is covering the sheet/document, be replace operation single or repeated. That is the method of discovery of the targets that allows to see the context in which those targets are present. Due to its design it is not a method supported by Find All/Replace All operation, which is therefore not relevant in regard to the present report. - Indeed my suggestion was to implement a complete F%R dialogue into a tool-bar. - By "jumping UI" you probably referred to a variability of UI hight, be it horizontal or vertical, that might occur. - Solution available: UI for an horizontal toolbar would avoid that behaviour by taking into account such a variability, by permanently exhibiting a required number of bars that are aimed to contain that variability. That was indeed a pertinent observation that Björn did on October 2015. We have a proposal that looked weird to me so I called UX. S Solution was offered to be marked a duplicate of sidebar solution, which is feasible. No argument was offered further on that, so I close as a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 95405 *** |