| Summary: | Add a section "experimental features" in the Release Notes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | Jean-Baptiste Faure <jbfaure> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
| Status: | NEW --- | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | olivier.hallot, raal, stephane.guillou |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3.3.0 release | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
|
Description
Jean-Baptiste Faure
2023-04-02 15:15:43 UTC
I agree this is a needed addition. The documentation for the Advanced panel does not attempt to list experimental features: https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/shared/optionen/java.html The banner used for (documented) experimental features is this one: https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/shared/optionen/experimental.html By searching which pages embed this banner, one can find some of the experimental features: https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?project=help&full=+%27embed+href%3D%22text%2Fshared%2Foptionen%2Fexperimental.xhp%23experimental%22%27&defs=&refs=&path=&hist=&type=&xrd=&nn=1&si=full&si=full The release notes is the perfect place to list such experimental features, as they will very much depend on the release, and it would be good to attract attention to them for contributors willing to test them. Some release notes pages did have that section, see for example: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/4.2#Experimental_Features And in the past, some new features were flagged as experimental in the release notes, see for example: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/7.0#Accessibility_improvements In my opinion, we should follow these guidelines: - In the body, list features that are not experimental anymore, but available by default - Have a separate section that lists _all_ experimental features for this version, to keep track of them. Thoughts? |