| Summary: | {Writer] Mirrored frame don't alternate between left &right sides | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | ajlittoz <page74010-sf> |
| Component: | Writer | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | dgp-mail |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 7.6.4.1 release | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| See Also: | https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65412 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 107656 | ||
| Attachments: | Mirrored frames are all rendered in right margin | ||
|
Description
ajlittoz
2024-02-24 19:31:08 UTC
I confirm the problem, but I would treat it as a duplicate of bug 65412. Could you explain, why you've opened a new report? At first, I was not sure to understand bug 65412, mainly for a terminology issue (outside/inside -- of what?-- used instead of outer/inner as in the dialogs) and the anchor. Anchoring "To page" is generally an error because it creates a single-usage frame hard-attached to a specific physical page. Therefore the frame occurs only once. Anchoring "To paragraph" causes potentially repetition of the frame (this is what is implied by inserting a page number in the frame) when the paragraph is in the header or footer. In this case, mirrored layout cause left/right alternation, NO MATTER WHETHER THE FRAME IS IN A MARGIN OR NOT. I mean that horizontal position like "1 cm from left" should behave as "1 cm from right" on the mirrored page. I admit this is ambiguous because we don't know if "1 cm from left" is originally specified in a left or right page and there is no way to tell. "Outer margin" and "Inner margin" are not ambiguous but they only request a sub-area of the page. But here, something like "1 cm from left" remains ambiguous with regard to mirroring. Comments by @Regina did not clarify the problem. The only interesting remark is "the feature is broken by design". Rereading carefully bug 65412, I think my report is finally a duplicate. I don't mind closing it with DUPLICATE status. Problem still present in 7.6.5.2 (In reply to ajlittoz from comment #2) > Rereading carefully bug 65412, I think my report is finally a duplicate. I > don't mind closing it with DUPLICATE status. So let's close it. Feel free to comment on bug 65412 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 65412 *** |