| Summary: | bibliography shows either number or short title in the entry not both | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | johnks <testing1237a-c> |
| Component: | Writer | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | dgp-mail, libreoffice-ux-advise, vsfoote |
| Priority: | medium | Keywords: | needsUXEval |
| Version: | 24.2.3.2 release | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 101258 | ||
| Attachments: | bibliography number test | ||
|
Description
johnks
2024-05-24 07:34:51 UTC
Created attachment 194326 [details]
bibliography number test
to reiterate the feature, currently we can either show the citation as lorem (John vs doe) ipsum or lorem (1) ipsum i am asking that we show the citation as Lorem (John vs doe (1) ipsum I can see the problem 1. Open attachment 194326 [details] 2. Place cursor into index -> edit index It's only possible to select or deselect "number entries", but you can't combine it with showing entries. But I also don't understand the order of entries in the index. It has john vs doe Cat vs dog but since it is sorted "Alphanumeric", I would expect Cat vs dog john vs doe I miss also information in help page about "Formating of the Entries" and "Sort", see https://help.libreoffice.org/24.8/en-GB/text/swriter/01/04120211.html?System=WIN&DbPAR=WRITER&HID=modules/swriter/ui/tocindexpage/TocIndexPage#bm_id3145247 So perhaps design team can give some insights Can we make this request a duplicate of bug 157064 or some other from META bug 101258? (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4) > Can we make this request a duplicate of bug 157064 Yes please. And rather than one off handling of a few styles as here, we need ability to style against CSL; and even better integration of CSL capable reference managers as extension (e.g. Zotero or Mendeley). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 157064 *** |