Bug 33932

Summary:	LibreOffice does not build without java
Product:	LibreOffice	Reporter:	suka <suka>
Component:	LibreOffice	Assignee:	Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal
Priority:	medium
Version:	3.3.0 release
Hardware:	Other
OS:	Linux (All)
URL:	https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352812
Whiteboard:
Crash report or crash signature:		Regression By:

Description suka 2011-02-05 03:50:04 UTC

When trying to build LibO 3.3.0 (build 3.3.0.4) without java we get reproducible build failures on Gentoo  and I frankly can't figure out what's going on ;-) The error is

Entering
/home/portage/app-office/libreoffice-3.3.0/work/libreoffice-build-3.3.0.4/build/libreoffice-3.3.0.4/sdext/source/presenter

dmake:  ../../unxlngx6.pro/misc/PresenterScreen.dpz:  line 105:  Error: --
Syntax error in % rule, missing % target

The only way to work around this is to completely disable all extensions (just pushing the different --disable-presenter-* statements to config is not enough) which is not a real option.

See the downstream bug for discussion

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352812

Comment 1 Björn Michaelsen 2011-12-23 11:50:44 UTC

[This is an automated message.]
This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it
started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is
changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back
to NEW please check if the bug still persists with the 3.5.0 beta1 or beta2 prereleases.
Details on how to test the 3.5.0 beta1 can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugHunting_Session_3.5.0.-1

more detail on this bulk operation: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RFC-Operation-Spamzilla-tp3607474p3607474.html

Comment 2 Sebastian@SSpaeth.de 2012-05-08 04:34:03 UTC

Given that the corresponding downstream bug has been closed as FIXED (with unmodified LO), I close this bug as fixed.

"Andreas Proschofsky gentoo-dev 2011-07-14 20:56:23 UTC  Extensions now work fine again without java (in 3.4.1) so finally closing this bug"