| Summary: | : Fields in embedded bibliography gets switched around | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | k.dalgard |
| Component: | Writer | Assignee: | David Tardon <dtardon> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | dtardon, k.dalgard |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3.5.3 release | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | BSA target:3.6.0 | ||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
| Attachments: | Test document for Bibliography entry sorting issue in 3.6 Beta 3 | ||
|
Description
k.dalgard
2012-05-09 17:10:03 UTC
(... that is: click on any element in the Short name select list.) David Tardon committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=bcbf4b061b2e923c2ff3b222458c286c8fa27a3a fdo#49709 set updated values to the right entries I am having a problem when I open a document in 3.6 Beta 3 that was created in version 3.5.4. My bibliography is number format like [1], [2], [3] etc. Normally the bibliography table is organised in the order in which the references appear in the document, but with 3.6 Beta 3 it seems they are in the order in which they were created. Also all references numbered greater than 10 are now replaced with [0] both in the document and in the table. Unfortunately I cannot reproduce this in a fresh document and the (many) documents that it occurs in contain proprietary information that I cannot freely send out. I can confirm however that 3.5.5 does not corrupt the bibliography in this way. Created attachment 64329 [details]
Test document for Bibliography entry sorting issue in 3.6 Beta 3
See comment for steps to reproduced
Edit to the above, I now have a test case. Steps to reproduce 1. Open the attached file in LoDev 3.6Beta3 2. Right click the Bibliography then Update Index/Table 3. The reference numbers are scrambled 4. Open the attached file in LibO 3.5.5 5. Right click the Bibliography then Update Index/Table 6. The reference numbers are correctly sorted |