| Summary: | Text improvements for TDF Site: qa-testers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | Rainer Bielefeld Retired <LibreOffice> |
| Component: | WWW | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | jmadero.dev, LibreOffice |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| URL: | http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/qa-testers/ | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
|
Description
Rainer Bielefeld Retired
2012-05-25 10:21:15 UTC
I am closing this as NOTABUG, for these types of things please email our mailing list and we'll have a discussion about it. Thanks for the input Correction: Link behind "LibreOffice bug tracker" should be <http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/> (BSA) or <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=LibreOffice;bug_status=UNCONFIRMED;version=?> Same for Link behind "bug report" in last sentence I am pretty sure that I discussed some of these issues with Marc Paré few days ago with the result that Marc did some very good suggestions how to improve the texts, and I thought at least this Bugzilla link would have been modified in between. I will piing him when he is back. @Joel: Please see my PM! Link behind "LibreOffice bug tracker" should be <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=LibreOffice;version=?> to avoid inappropriate Version suggestion "Master" WORKSFORME Link behind "bug report" in last sentence "bug report" also should be <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=LibreOffice;version=?> to avoid inappropriate Version suggestion "Master" Not sure I understand. Last sentence "every bug report" goes to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=LibreOffice which is imo fine. WORKSFORME link behind "LibreOffice bug tracker" should be <http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/> (BSA) or <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=LibreOffice;bug_status=UNCONFIRMED;version=?> That's the case. WORKSFORME I don't see any further action to be taken, maybe except that wiki page could use an overall cleanup. But imo it's more work posting those tine adjustments than just doing them (after discussing with QA in the IRC channel). |