Bug 51277

Summary: EDITING: Copy and Paste between Writer and Impress
Product: LibreOffice Reporter: bruhein <kerstgens>
Component: ImpressAssignee: Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: minor CC: jmadero.dev
Priority: high    
Version: 3.5.3 release   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard: BSA
Crash report or crash signature: Regression By:
Attachments: Screenshot of fresh pasted table in Impress

Description bruhein 2012-06-20 22:00:41 UTC
Created attachment 63280 [details]
Screenshot of fresh pasted table in Impress

Problem description: Copy a table from Writer and paste to Impress does not work

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create table in Writer and format with some nice background color and span over some fields
2. Select table and copy with Ctl-C (or via menue)
3. Open Impress and paste with Ctrl-V (or via menue)

Current behavior: Table is inserted with own design. All formatting has gone and the span over columns/fields is destroyed. Table can not be used any more or needs heavy reformatting.

Expected behavior: Data exchange between Writer and Impress should work seamless. So table should look exactly the same in Writer or Impress.

Platform (if different from the browser): 
              
Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/13.0
Comment 1 Roland Baudin 2012-06-21 08:30:11 UTC
More on this bug : the same problem occurs when copy / pasting from Writer to Writer. It happens that all the styles and formatting of the source document is copied to the destination document and this is not undoable.
I see this bug on Linux 64 bits.
RB
Comment 2 Roland Baudin 2012-06-21 08:33:46 UTC
Oops, sorry! Don't take into account my previous comment because it was related to another bug with nearly the same name (don't know how to delete a comment I wrote by mistake?).
RB
Comment 3 IagoSRL 2012-12-19 10:34:14 UTC
Maybe this is dupe of bug 51103? Both seems refer to the same problem and same version branch.
Still happens with version 3.6? And 4.0 beta?
Thanks!
Comment 4 Joel Madero 2013-02-07 17:35:05 UTC
indeed, this is a duplicate. Marking as such

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 51103 ***