| Summary: | PDF: Export to a single page | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | Daniel L <daniel.liabeuf> |
| Component: | Printing and PDF export | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NOTABUG | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | fdbugs, ign_christian, ilmari.lauhakangas, xiscofauli |
| Priority: | medium | Keywords: | bibisectRequest, regression |
| Version: | 4.0.3.3 release | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
| Attachments: |
Long text file
Big spreadsheet |
||
|
Description
Daniel L
2013-06-18 14:30:00 UTC
Could you attach sample doc showing that problem? Perhaps we was testing on different case. (I only test Impress) > Reproduced on https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60994#c4 > (ign_christian says "choosing Default nor Single page doesn't make any > difference") Seems that I have made wrong statement, that means I can reproduce :) Sorry for that > Regression: Not reproducible on 4.0.4.2 Should be: reproducible on 4.0.4.2. Perhaps you know last version worked so that can be said regression. Created attachment 81027 [details]
Long text file
Created attachment 81028 [details]
Big spreadsheet
(In reply to comment #2) > Seems that I have made wrong statement, that means I can reproduce :) > Sorry for that Nop, I misspoke > > Regression: Not reproducible on 4.0.4.2 > Should be: reproducible on 4.0.4.2. Perhaps you know last version worked so > that can be said regression. Whoops! I meant "Not reproductible on 4.0.1.2" I can reproduce the bug on Calc 4.1.0.0-beta2 and 4.0.4.2 > I can reproduce the bug on Calc 4.1.0.0-beta2 and 4.0.4.2
I can also reproduce that with 2 files attached (LO 4.0.4.2 - Win7 32bit).
So we can mark it NEW
Confirmed with master and added whiteboard and keyword. Win 7 64-bit Version: 4.4.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: b7d8a58ff2698ffc6e22943f64aa97c5ea253bd9 TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2014-11-05_00:40:38 Could anybody confirm this is a regression? I can reproduce this issue using the files attached with the oldest commit ( d6cde02dbce8c28c6af836e2dc1120f8a6ef9932 ) of bibisect-43all in ubuntu 14.10 This seems to be a confusion about the purpose of the "Initial View" settings. They do not affect how the pages of the PDF are generated, only how they are shown by the viewer (initially - the user can still select other view options) "Single page" sets it to scroll one whole page at a time "Continuous" sets it to scroll smoothly between pages etc. This works as expected on LO 4.3.4.1 and current 4.5 master. In addition, while Adobe Reader / Acrobat etc. obey these settings, most other viewers probably do not. Setting Status: RESOLVED, NOTABUG Migrating Whiteboard tags to Keywords: (bibisectRequest) [NinjaEdit] |