| Summary: | References get updated differently whether it's copied or cut within the same columns | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | sworddragon2 |
| Component: | Calc | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
| Status: | NEW --- | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 4.2.2.1 release | ||
| Hardware: | x86-64 (AMD64) | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| See Also: | https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143962 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 108253, 108917 | ||
|
Description
sworddragon2
2014-03-08 07:42:17 UTC
reproducible with LO 4.2.1.1 (Win 8.1) In the bug report seems to be a small typing error: Step 5: "Select A1 and B1" -> "Select A2 and B2" You are right with the typo and there is even another typo: 'Normally I would expect that the formula would be "=SUMME(A$1:A2)" too.' -> 'Normally I would expect that the formula would be "=SUMME(A$1:A4)" too.'. But it seems I can't edit my post. Yes, this is intentional. The way Calc updates references during copy-n-pasting and cut-n-pasting are different. This is not a bug. If you check the previous versions of Calc it's always behaved this way. Having said that, I just checked Excel's behavior. Excel behaves identically to Calc *except* when the original range and the pasted range are both in the same columns Excel behaves the way the reporter describes. Very interesting. For example, in this scenario, in Excel, when you cut and paste A2:B2 to A4:B4, the reference becomes A$1:A4, however, when you cut and paste A2:B2 to B3:C3, the reference remains unchanged. Is this difference critical though? That's the question. I'll set it to enhancement request. > when you cut and paste A2:B2 to B3:C3, the reference remains unchanged.
So if I'm understanding all your post correctly if you would copy this in Excel the reference would then change?
|