Bug 77357

Summary: Failed dependencies libobasis4.2-en-US <= 4.2.2.1-1
Product: LibreOffice Reporter: Todd <ToddAndMargo>
Component: LibreOfficeAssignee: Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: normal CC: ilmari.lauhakangas
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.2.3.3 release   
Hardware: Other   
OS: All   
See Also: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80112
Whiteboard:
Crash report or crash signature: Regression By:

Description Todd 2014-04-12 03:44:39 UTC
Would you guys please fix this?


# tar xzvf LibreOffice_4.2.3_Linux_x86-64_rpm.tar.gz

# rpm -Uvh LibreOffice_4.2.3.3_Linux_x86-64_rpm/RPMS/*.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
        libobasis4.2-en-US <= 4.2.2.1-1 is needed by (installed) libobasis4.2-en-US-help-4.2.2.1-1.x86_64
Comment 1 ign_christian 2014-06-10 08:34:32 UTC
Hi.. Is that issue still happen in 4.2.4? If no, please close this report.
Comment 2 Todd 2014-06-10 16:51:16 UTC
Fixed.  Thank you!
Comment 3 Todd 2014-06-13 01:52:10 UTC
It is back.  Please reopen.

rpm -Uvh LibreOffice_4.2.4.2_Linux_x86-64_rpm/RPMS/*
error: Failed dependencies:
        libobasis4.2-en-US <= 4.2.3.3-3 is needed by (installed) libobasis4.2-en-US-help-4.2.3.3-3.x86_64
Comment 4 Todd 2014-06-20 18:10:51 UTC
4.2.5.2 also

# rpm -Uvh LibreOffice_4.2.5.2_Linux_x86-64_rpm/RPMS/*.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
        libobasis4.2-en-US <= 4.2.4.2-2 is needed by (installed) libobasis4.2-en-US-help-4.2.4.2-2.x86_64
Comment 5 Todd 2014-08-29 21:18:32 UTC
Guys!

# rpm -Uvh LibreOffice_4.3.1.2_Linux_x86-64_rpm/RPMS/*.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
        libobasis4.3-en-US <= 4.3.0.4-4 is needed by (installed) libobasis4.3-en-US-help-4.3.0.4-4.x86_64
Comment 6 Todd 2014-08-29 21:47:10 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Guys!
> 
> # rpm -Uvh LibreOffice_4.3.1.2_Linux_x86-64_rpm/RPMS/*.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
>         libobasis4.3-en-US <= 4.3.0.4-4 is needed by (installed)
> libobasis4.3-en-US-help-4.3.0.4-4.x86_64

# rpm -qa libobasis4.3-en-US
libobasis4.3-en-US-4.3.1.2-2.x86_64

So, the revision is current, but the SPEC FILE is out of date
Comment 7 Buovjaga 2014-11-05 12:31:39 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 76227 ***