| Summary: | Chrome doesn't allow download of LibO .msi package claiming it's malicious | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | Anthony Gouldwell <ajgenator> |
| Component: | WWW | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NOTOURBUG | ||
| Severity: | critical | CC: | barta, bfo.bugmail, jerry.berglund, jmadero.dev, pierre.sundberg, robinson.libreoffice, serval2412, website |
| Priority: | high | Keywords: | possibleRegression |
| Version: | 4.1.6.2 release | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Windows (All) | ||
| Whiteboard: | BSA | ||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
|
Description
Anthony Gouldwell
2014-05-08 18:55:45 UTC
try 4.2.4.2 final released today *** Bug 78553 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Put it at New since there's a dup so it seems Chrome doesn't block *installation* but rather *download* of the LibO install package. the duplicate is moreover about 4.1.6.2 release so it seems it's a more general issue towards any LibO install package. question now is: which side is the bug? problem inside LibO package or Google Chrome false positive? setting to critical, since if people can't download LO via the most popular browser, is is very critical indeed. I can verify that Chrome (Version 34.0.1847.131 m) on Windows 7, marks all three available released versions currently availably from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-stable/#change as malicios, and is blocking them. Released versions: - 4.1.6 - 4.2.3 - 2.2.4 NOTOURBUG candidate, but if every future download will be marked as malicious then TDF has problem with Google. CCing QA people to take action if possible or escalate to ESC as this is not the first report about it. (In reply to comment #7) > NOTOURBUG candidate, but if every future download will be marked as > malicious then TDF has problem with Google. > CCing QA people to take action if possible or escalate to ESC as this is not > the first report about it. We file whitelist requests with Symantec for our binaries, but for other such systems there's not always a way to request a whitelisting. If you're unsure about the validity of a TDF binary, please do check the signature to verify it's genuine, as we do sign all of our installers. Thanks! Resolving -> NOTOURBUG Migrating Whiteboard tags to Keywords: (possibleRegression) [NinjaEdit] |