| Summary: | EDITING: FEATURE-REQUEST: down-arrow on last line should move to end of line | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | Eyolf Østrem <eyolf> |
| Component: | Writer | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | cno, danielboontje, libreoffice-ux-advise, vsfoote |
| Priority: | medium | Keywords: | needsUXEval |
| Version: | Inherited From OOo | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 98259 | ||
|
Description
Eyolf Østrem
2014-09-10 12:54:50 UTC
Hi Eyolf,
Thanks for the issue - I see no objection
(but for me, no advantage too, to be honest).
> New & cheers,
Cor
It's purely for convenience - but if one spends a lot of time in front of a Writer window, it's those little conveniences that matter. I might also add that a similar bug/feature re[port|quest] that I filed with KDE's editor Kate in 2006 has now finally been implemented! Even before that, I filed the same issue with OpenOffice, and never heard a word, other than "That's a silly request!" So thanks for the positive reception! *** Bug 132295 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** This is actually a rather bad idea--a special movement detecting 'last line of last paragraph'. Modifying the <Down> cursor's current action, uno:goDown (labeled "To line below"), with additional logic when positioned on the last line of the document, would require it be checked on each usage. IMHO unnecessary as the <End> key already is assigned the uno:goToEndOfLine action and functions on any line of document. Also, we provide a specific uno:goToParagraphEnd "To Paragraph End", that while unassigned can be user customized for use as a keyboard shortcut--as a movement applicable within any paragraph, not just the last line of the last paragraph. => WF a bad idea which other word-processors have implemented... :/ " => WF " means what? (In reply to Dan from comment #5) > a bad idea which other word-processors have implemented... :/ > " => WF " means what? => WF, my UX recommendation for a WONTFIX outcome for this enhancement. True, editors do this. But for what reason? And I don't see any use case like "I want to select the full paragraph" (which is solved by the extra command). So cuncur with Stuart's WF. |