Created attachment 125305 [details]
The docx file in question
I have a letter template from my university administration in docx format, which looks slightly different in MSOffice 2010 and LibreOffice 5.1.3. In particular, LibreOffice shows only the upper half of the last line of text.
Example documents are attached. The document actually shows four different problems; I will open separate bugs for the other three.
Thanks for your consideration.
Created attachment 125306 [details]
The document as shown by MSOffice 2010
Created attachment 125307 [details]
The document as shown by LibreOffice 5.1.3
Arch Linux 64-bit, KDE Plasma 5
Build ID: 60041cb237ea73c2c1885dd6afd99d88780c2dfc
CPU Threads: 8; OS Version: Linux 4.5; UI Render: default;
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8)
Built on May 26th 2016
LibreOfficeDev 126.96.36.199.alpha1 f4ca1573fcf445164c068c1046ab5d084e1b005f
Debian Testing, Mate Desktop
Actually, it even got a little worse. Unlike previous versions, LibreOffice5.3 now breaks the line between "elektronische" and "Dokumente".
This bug a duplicate of
which is solved.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 101627 ***
Footer text "Kein Zugang für elektronisch signierte sowie verschlüsselte elektronische Dokumente" is, as other text, font "Univers 45 Light" bold italic in MSO.
LO doesn't have that font and it replaces it. Not shown with which font, bug 61134.
Replacement is not adequate, which is in general bug 64509. Recommended replacements are non-free: http://www.identifont.com/similar?X6. Other possibilities are Open Sans or Milford.
Seems that previous replacement as shown in attachment 125307 [details] was better than the current in LO 6.4+. And that seems like an issue that I'll mention in bug 64509.
Footer box with "Zufahrt Heckelstraße Willersbau C-Flügel" opens wrongly as TNR 12 in LO. In MSO it's also "Univers 45 Light" 7.
(In reply to Timur from comment #7)
> Seems that previous replacement as shown in attachment 125307 [details] was
> better than the current in LO 6.4+.
Yes, attachment 125307 [details] looked OK with font replacement but when I myself tested LO 5.1 it looks the same as LO 6.4+, with inadequate font substitute. I can't say why. So I will not mention this is font substitute bug.