Description: This is not a bug, but I have being sent here trying to pull a request; this is therefore a request... I think it will be awesome to have an Org-mode -similar to emacs- on LibreOffice..., with functions similar to the ones on emacs -that I love- but with the kind of flexibility of controls that LibreOffice gives... Carcharot. Actual Results: a working org-mode on LibreOffice Expected Results: a working Org-Mode on Libreoffice Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/54.0.2840.59 Safari/537.36 OPR/41.0.2353.46
This is a pretty far fetched idea that is almost definitely never going to be implemented. That being said, it's a valid request (might help a corner case of users) and wouldn't really hurt any user. Moving to NEW. FYI: Enhancements are handled entirely by volunteers. A volunteer with some serious skills and some serious time would have to find this interesting enough to tackle. This is *incredibly unlikely* so I wouldn't hold your breath that it'll ever be implemented.
(In reply to Joel Madero from comment #1) > This is a pretty far fetched idea that is almost definitely never going to > be implemented. > > That being said, it's a valid request (might help a corner case of users) > and wouldn't really hurt any user. Moving to NEW. > > FYI: Enhancements are handled entirely by volunteers. A volunteer with some > serious skills and some serious time would have to find this interesting > enough to tackle. This is *incredibly unlikely* so I wouldn't hold your > breath that it'll ever be implemented. Thanks for your advice..., it is true what you say about it's implementation being unlikely... If I had skills -not necesarily serious, just some skills at all, informatikally speaking-, I would do it for me and others, but i don't... That sayed, and just to ad some more fire to the pyre :P, I think that not all org-mode must be implemented..., just a few core functions of org-mode would be enough..., and just on LO Writer... Let say Scheduling-Deathlines, tags, hierarchical-indentation of headlines, with its sistem of moving up and down as a block with its deppendencies, some hot-keys here and there, and a limited agenda-view not even interactive mounted on the previously referred alternatives... I know it is a lot of work, but it also would very likely be used by a lot of people, I think... (everybody that works has a to-do system implemented...). Thanks again, Carcharot.
(In reply to carcharot from comment #3) > (In reply to Joel Madero from comment #1) > > This is a pretty far fetched idea that is almost definitely never going to > > be implemented. > > > > That being said, it's a valid request (might help a corner case of users) > > and wouldn't really hurt any user. Moving to NEW. > > > > FYI: Enhancements are handled entirely by volunteers. A volunteer with some > > serious skills and some serious time would have to find this interesting > > enough to tackle. This is *incredibly unlikely* so I wouldn't hold your > > breath that it'll ever be implemented. > > Thanks for your advice..., it is true what you say about it's implementation > being unlikely... If I had skills -not necesarily serious, just some skills > at all, informatikally speaking-, I would do it for me and others, but i > don't... > That sayed, and just to ad some more fire to the pyre :P, I think that not > all org-mode must be implemented..., just a few core functions of org-mode > would be enough..., and just on LO Writer... > Let say Scheduling-Deathlines, tags, hierarchical-indentation of headlines, > with its sistem of moving up and down as a block with its deppendencies, > some hot-keys here and there, and a limited agenda-view not even interactive > mounted on the previously referred alternatives... > I know it is a lot of work, but it also would very likely be used by a lot > of people, I think... (everybody that works has a to-do system > implemented...). > Thanks again, > Carcharot. I wish to erase this, but do not know how...
*** Bug 117709 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
We should ask UX, if this is to be accepted as a core feature.
That's definitely not what a WYSIWYG word processor is made for. This mode would heavily restrict functionalities and, if implemented, rather another module than a modification of Writer or Calc, for example. And do we really need another calendar or project manager? OTOH, nothing to say against an extension.