Description: I don't know if it should count as a bug, but the placement of the combobox (and other functions) is related to the text label. It's dancing a bit. Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open Calc 2.Insert -> Headers and Footers.. 3.Switch a few times back and forward between Header and Footer tab Actual Results: The align of the combobox and other function's isn't quite the same Expected Results: The alignment should be the same (I think) Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: YES Additional Info: Version: 5.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 4130c8def811d1dcc87eacaa8ae48ba02738a790 CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.19; UI Render: GL; TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2016-11-29_01:03:18 Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0
Confirmed. Win 7 Pro 64-bit Version: 5.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 142618ecae472e535c582c0fb357d2a9a76655f1 CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.1; UI Render: default; TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2016-11-28_00:46:57 Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI); Calc: group
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Repro Version: 6.1.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: cc1db6f2b0ebe05ae807628778835b62df00eca2 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3; UI render: default; TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-12-02_23:45:34 Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL
Dear Telesto, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Reproduced using current daily master build Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 9a37652b79001bf5208841b9221dee851b9b6d0f CPU threads: 6; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22621; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded
repro 26.2+ Assume it is because the proportional text length of "header" is larger than "footer", so one label takes up more space than the other. Even if fixed for "English", this would still be expected to be a "problem" for other languages.
(In reply to Justin L from comment #8) > repro 26.2+ > > Assume it is because the proportional text length of "header" is larger than > "footer", so one label takes up more space than the other. Even if fixed for > "English", this would still be expected to be a "problem" for other > languages. Do you have code pointers?
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #9) > Do you have code pointers? No (that's why I marked it as "interesting"), but it shouldn't be too hard to find the .ui file that contains these strings.
(In reply to Justin L from comment #10) > (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #9) > > Do you have code pointers? > > No (that's why I marked it as "interesting"), but it shouldn't be too hard > to find the .ui file that contains these strings. Ok, we should still have pointers with interesting hacks. What I found is sc/uiconfig/scalc/ui/headerfootercontent.ui