Bug 106320 - [NEWHELP] Improve bookmark extraction for new Help
Summary: [NEWHELP] Improve bookmark extraction for new Help
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Documentation (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
5.3.0.2 rc
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 97745
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2017-03-04 17:05 UTC by Olivier Hallot
Modified: 2018-02-11 12:29 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Olivier Hallot 2017-03-04 17:05:35 UTC 
The current script bookmark.sh extract bookmarks from XHP files quite simplistically, by calling bookmark.xsl transformation.and generation a simple <ul> list (1 level)

It will be nice to group bookmarks as in the current Helpcontent2, with 2 levels.

e.g.
Level1.1
   Level 2.1
   Level 2.2
   Level 2.3
Level2.1
   Level 2.1
   Level 2.2
   Level 2.3

or
open
   open remote files
   documents
   forms
   objects
   ....
Comment 1 Fakabbir amin 2017-03-04 19:16:33 UTC 
The bookmarks are arranged in alphabetical order.
So, Do it need to be grouped by alphabets or 
Lets say
A piece of html is like: 

editing;captions
editing; concordance files
editing;cross-references
editing;footnotes/endnotes
editing;indexes/tables of contents
editing; index format
editing;sections
editing;table/index entries
editing;text frames

has to be arranged as 
(A):
editing:
   captions
   concordance files
   ecross-references
   footnotes/endnotes  
   indexes/tables of contents
   index format
   sections
   table/index entries
   text frames

or like
(B):
e:
  editing;captions
  editing; concordance files
  editing;cross-references
  editing;footnotes/endnotes
  editing;indexes/tables of contents
  editing; index format
  editing;sections
  editing;table/index entries
  editing;text frames
  editors;contour editor
Comment 2 Olivier Hallot 2017-03-04 20:57:01 UTC 
The correct is scheme (A) below


(In reply to Fakabbir amin from comment #1)
> The bookmarks are arranged in alphabetical order.
> So, Do it need to be grouped by alphabets or 
> Lets say
> A piece of html is like: 
> 
> editing;captions
> editing; concordance files
> editing;cross-references
> editing;footnotes/endnotes
> editing;indexes/tables of contents
> editing; index format
> editing;sections
> editing;table/index entries
> editing;text frames
> 
> has to be arranged as 
> (A):
> editing:
>    captions
>    concordance files
>    ecross-references
>    footnotes/endnotes  
>    indexes/tables of contents
>    index format
>    sections
>    table/index entries
>    text frames
> 
> or like
> (B):
> e:
>   editing;captions
>   editing; concordance files
>   editing;cross-references
>   editing;footnotes/endnotes
>   editing;indexes/tables of contents
>   editing; index format
>   editing;sections
>   editing;table/index entries
>   editing;text frames
>   editors;contour editor
Comment 3 Xisco Faulí 2017-09-11 08:51:32 UTC 
Dear developer,
This bug has been in ASSIGNED status for more than 3 months without any activity. Resetting it to NEW.
Please assigned it back to yourself if you're still working on this.
Comment 4 Olivier Hallot 2018-02-11 12:29:42 UTC 
Currente developments turns this bug to no importance.