Bug 106569 - FILEOPEN DOCX: EMF logo text appears to be a lot thicker than in Word (default rendering only)
Summary: FILEOPEN DOCX: EMF logo text appears to be a lot thicker than in Word (defaul...
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: filters and storage (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
4.1.0.4 release
Hardware: All Windows (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard: interoperability
Keywords: filter:emf, notBibisectable, regression
Depends on:
Blocks: EMF-WMF
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2017-03-16 12:29 UTC by Gabor Kelemen (allotropia)
Modified: 2017-08-30 18:23 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
The document containing the logo (211.60 KB, application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document)
2017-03-16 12:29 UTC, Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) 		Details
The document in LO 5.3 and Word 2010 side by side (336.39 KB, image/png)
2017-03-16 12:32 UTC, Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) 		Details
The image extracted from the docx file (507.79 KB, image/x-emf)
2017-03-16 12:36 UTC, Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) 2017-03-16 12:29:57 UTC 
Created attachment 131927 [details]
The document containing the logo

Attached company form contains a text logo in EMF format, which appears with a lot thicker, barely legible font in LO 5.3 on Win 7 and also in 5.2.3 on Win 8.1.

It is interesting that I could not reproduce the problem on Ubuntu 14.04 with LO 5.3.
Comment 1 Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) 2017-03-16 12:32:14 UTC 
Created attachment 131928 [details]
The document in LO 5.3 and Word 2010 side by side
Comment 2 Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) 2017-03-16 12:36:20 UTC 
Created attachment 131929 [details]
The image extracted from the docx file
Comment 3 Xisco Faulí 2017-03-16 16:28:07 UTC 
I can't reproduce it in

Version: 5.4.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: d3b5bd4a07a619db6bee1c39c32280ac3c620532
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.8; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; 
Locale: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8); Calc: group
Comment 4 Aron Budea 2017-03-16 19:30:03 UTC 
Reproduced with 5.3.0.3 / Windows 7, but only with default rendering, and not on Ubuntu 16.04, either.
Comment 5 Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) 2017-03-17 08:37:53 UTC 
I have turned on GL support and it appears like in Word on the same machine.
We can say this is a workaround for now :). 
But it would be nice to fix the default renderer too, just in case.
Comment 6 Aron Budea 2017-03-25 19:00:05 UTC 
Looks bad in 4.1.0.4, looks good in 4.0.0.3.
=> regression, but it's older than Windows bibisect repos, so not bibisectable
Comment 7 Timur 2017-08-24 18:15:56 UTC 
Looks fine to me now with https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ebc11ae0b132eefd3b1b1a837a8d0ad3ba73b460.
Please confirm.
Comment 8 Xisco Faulí 2017-08-30 18:23:51 UTC 
looks good in 

Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 78960ad06faca055a6d97afbc764c902d5d07f6f
CPU threads: 1; OS: Windows 6.1; UI render: default; 
TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2017-08-30_06:31:19
Locale: es-ES (es_ES); Calc: group