Description: The blue page break line visualization disappears after updating TOC (and reappears after scrolling) Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open attached file 2. Right Click the Table of Content and select update index Actual Results: The visualization of the page breaks is disappearing after updating TOC Expected Results: Shouldn't disappear at all Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Found in Version: 5.4.0.0.alpha0+ CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.19; UI render: GL; TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-04-05_23:32:27 Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL and in Version: 5.0.6.3 Build ID: 490fc03b25318460cfc54456516ea2519c11d1aa Locale: en-US (nl_NL) but not in Version: 5.0.0.5 Build ID: 1b1a90865e348b492231e1c451437d7a15bb262b Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0
Created attachment 132722 [details] Example file
Repro with document. Arch Linux 64-bit, KDE Plasma 5 Version: 5.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 9348b322a5c230dfcc2231661b73e480b130fcd9 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.10; UI render: default; VCL: kde4; Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); Calc: group Built on April 28th 2016
I think the bug was introduced between bibisect-64.5.4 version origin/master and daily Linux dbgutil bibisect repository version 2016-05-25. I do not have that range covered by a bibisect repository. On my debian-stretch system, I observe ... (*) It is necessary to zoom out until the index and the page boundary are visible at the same time. I also chose to turn off side-by-side display of pages. (*) The blue line is restored by any of - scroll wheel - movement by the vertical or horizontal scroll bar - <PageDn> when cursor is at the end of the document (*) The blue line is not restore by keyboard movement of the caret, neither by <down> nor by <PageDn> except when the caret is at the end of the document.
Regression introduced in range https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?id=e9c01db5268a16d657d20f07a083583c2d2b011c&qt=range&q=0c1d3f0c17296c113358228cf36596347fd045e3..84eafb6a051863a775f122cec1bc27d9f5fef6e4
Xisco, May I ask what bibisect repository you used?
(In reply to Terrence Enger from comment #5) > Xisco, > > May I ask what bibisect repository you used? Sorry for not mentioning lo-linux-dbgutil-daily-till51
*** Bug 108553 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Removing keyword "bibisectRequest" as it's already bibisected.
I'd say this and bug 117180 are the same.
Fixed by the same commit as bug 117347 (and 117347), closing as dupe. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 117347 ***
Oops, I meant bug 117180, but the commit is for bug 117347, there's just a more obvious connection to bug 117180. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 117180 ***