Bug 107707 (Writer-Tables-Enhancements) - [META] Writer table enhancements requests
Summary: [META] Writer table enhancements requests
Status: NEW
Alias: Writer-Tables-Enhancements
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
unspecified
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 33631 34397 35302 35570 38543 40350 40879 43524 48763 49258 51689 52596 57189 57792 61934 63634 63725 66008 66019 69305 70384 71261 72040 75375 77336 81808 85754 88600 89112 90165 90602 93395 93811 94474 95741 96576 99027 99035 101123 102359 104443 105597 113603 113604 114467 114633 115098 116685 122648 123116 34388 37223 64242 82504 83623 87590 88807 90882 90883 102193 103141 104172 109155 117232 121705 121857
Blocks: Writer-Tables LibO-Enhancements
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2017-05-08 18:34 UTC by Telesto
Modified: 2019-02-03 22:10 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Telesto 2017-05-08 18:34:22 UTC Comment hidden (no-value)
Comment 1 Roman Kuznetsov 2019-01-20 19:19:54 UTC
Telesto, why need this META if we have bug 103100 Writer tables and (also) enhancements?
Comment 2 Telesto 2019-01-20 21:31:30 UTC
(In reply to Roman Kuznetsov from comment #1)
> Telesto, why need this META if we have bug 103100 Writer tables and (also)
> enhancements?

Main reason: meta bug 103100 quite bloated if they are all listed at once. So differentiating between 'enhancements' and 'real' bug more for convenience. It also gives a nice listing of the enhancement request. But that's my take on it... Not sure what the common opinion is about the need for this meta bug.. I probably didn't ask for permission either.. So feel free to close it, if it improves things in one way or another.
Comment 3 Roman Kuznetsov 2019-01-21 10:25:47 UTC
(In reply to Telesto from comment #2)
> (In reply to Roman Kuznetsov from comment #1)
> > Telesto, why need this META if we have bug 103100 Writer tables and (also)
> > enhancements?
> 
> Main reason: meta bug 103100 quite bloated if they are all listed at once.
> So differentiating between 'enhancements' and 'real' bug more for
> convenience. It also gives a nice listing of the enhancement request. But
> that's my take on it... Not sure what the common opinion is about the need
> for this meta bug.. I probably didn't ask for permission either.. So feel
> free to close it, if it improves things in one way or another.

I agree with you, so I offer:

1. Rename bug 103100 to general [META] Writer table bugs
2. Move all enhancements from bug 103100 to this bug 107707
Comment 4 Thomas Lendo 2019-01-30 19:18:21 UTC
Please do not hustle. This enhancement meta bug is only for bugs that don't fit into another sub meta bug, regardless if it's a bug or an enhancement request. So please don't move enhancement requests from other sub meta bugs to this meta bug.