Bug 111555 - I am not found real UNICODE conform Old Hungarian or Szekely-Hungarian fonts under windows version of Libreoffice
Summary: I am not found real UNICODE conform Old Hungarian or Szekely-Hungarian fonts ...
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
5.4.0.3 release
Hardware: All Windows (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2017-08-09 13:52 UTC by Kovács Viktor
Modified: 2017-08-10 09:47 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kovács Viktor 2017-08-09 13:52:43 UTC 
Description:
Linux version of writer have a UNICODE conform Old Hungarian or Szekely-Hungarian Font, which is called UNICODE_Maros_ext. Windows version does not have it, instead supports several NON(!) UNICODE conform fonts, for example: Sz-Hun Prop. Unicode, Kapossi prop. Unicode, etc. Why?

Actual Results:  
I tried insert Old Hungarian "a" symbol with Insert->Special symbol.
Using Sz-Hun Prop. Unicode  font, Old Hungarian "a" is placed into U+860 code. 

Expected Results:
The correct one is U+101c0 point. UNICODE_Maros_ext font-set implements it correctly. I think, must remove all non-unicode conform fonts, under named Rovas fonts, and change it correct ones.


Reproducible: Always

User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
[Information automatically included from LibreOffice]
Locale: hu
Module: TextDocument
[Information guessed from browser]
OS: Windows (All)
OS is 64bit: no
Builds ID: LibreOffice 5.4.0.3


User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0
Comment 1 Julien Nabet 2017-08-09 15:06:13 UTC 
Khaled: thought you might be interested in this one since it concerns fonts.
Comment 2 Kovács Viktor 2017-08-09 15:37:52 UTC 
What did you mean about it?
Comment 3 Julien Nabet 2017-08-09 15:41:11 UTC 
(In reply to Kovács Viktor from comment #2)
> What did you mean about it?

Kovács: my last comment was for Khaled that I put in cc, so not for you.
Comment 4 Kovács Viktor 2017-08-09 16:09:23 UTC 
I am sorry! But I have a mistake: codepage is u+10c80-10cff.
Comment 5 ⁨خالد حسني⁩ 2017-08-10 03:43:57 UTC 
I’m not sure what the bug report is about.
Comment 6 Kovács Viktor 2017-08-10 09:25:19 UTC 
I am sorry. I did something wrong.
Comment 7 Julien Nabet 2017-08-10 09:47:44 UTC 
Thank you Kovács for your feedback.
nitpick: since there's no bug indeed, let's put this one to INVALID