Bug 111692 - EDITING: Right table cell border temporally disappears after highlighting text within a table cell
Summary: EDITING: Right table cell border temporally disappears after highlighting tex...
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
4.4.6.3 release
Hardware: All All
: medium trivial
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2017-08-11 12:30 UTC by Telesto
Modified: 2018-02-13 19:17 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
Example file (14.42 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2017-08-28 18:35 UTC, Telesto 		Details
Screenshot (438.23 KB, image/jpeg)
2017-08-31 19:32 UTC, Telesto 		Details
Screencast (4.03 MB, video/avi)
2017-09-01 18:46 UTC, Telesto 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Telesto 2017-08-11 12:30:52 UTC 
Description:
Right table cell border temporally disappears after highlighting text within a table cell

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open the attached file
2. Select the text in B1 and apply some highlighting. Notice that the right border will be partly gone.
3. Exit the table; problem is resolved

Actual Results:  
Visual glitch: the border partially disappears

Expected Results:
Shouldn't happen


Reproducible: Always

User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
Found in
Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 386fcf9be786b302cd2c6f85ff6d8d97a6777926
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.19; UI render: GL; 
TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-08-06_01:57:50
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL

and in
Versie: 4.4.6.3 
Build ID: e8938fd3328e95dcf59dd64e7facd2c7d67c704d
Locale: nl_NL

but not in
Version: 4.4.0.3
Build ID: de093506bcdc5fafd9023ee680b8c60e3e0645d7
Locale: nl_NL


User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0
Comment 1 Buovjaga 2017-08-28 18:22:56 UTC 
No file attached.
Comment 2 Telesto 2017-08-28 18:35:04 UTC 
Created attachment 135830 [details]
Example file
Comment 3 Buovjaga 2017-08-30 11:52:30 UTC 
No problem here. Is it dependent on OpenGL?

Win 10
Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: 8d74698f407de0b02826777d5cb3f5aca2fd50f1
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.19; UI render: default; 
TinderBox: Win-x86_64@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-08-24_23:26:55
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI); Calc: group
Comment 4 Telesto 2017-08-31 18:52:50 UTC 
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #3)
> No problem here. Is it dependent on OpenGL?
> 
> Win 10
> Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
> Build ID: 8d74698f407de0b02826777d5cb3f5aca2fd50f1
> CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.19; UI render: default; 
> TinderBox: Win-x86_64@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-08-24_23:26:55
> Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI); Calc: group

It isn't OpenGL related. It doesn't happen when selecting cell B2; only when selecting the content within the cell:
1. Open the attached file
2. Select the last Paragraph in cell B2 starting with: Aliquam velit massa,
3. Apply some highlighting. 
4. Remove the selection by place the text cursor somewhere else (in cell B2)
Comment 5 Buovjaga 2017-08-31 19:12:08 UTC 
(In reply to Telesto from comment #4)
> (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #3)
> > No problem here. Is it dependent on OpenGL?
> > 
> > Win 10
> > Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
> > Build ID: 8d74698f407de0b02826777d5cb3f5aca2fd50f1
> > CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.19; UI render: default; 
> > TinderBox: Win-x86_64@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-08-24_23:26:55
> > Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI); Calc: group
> 
> It isn't OpenGL related. It doesn't happen when selecting cell B2; only when
> selecting the content within the cell:
> 1. Open the attached file
> 2. Select the last Paragraph in cell B2 starting with: Aliquam velit massa,
> 3. Apply some highlighting. 
> 4. Remove the selection by place the text cursor somewhere else (in cell B2)

No repro (B1, that is).

Win 10
Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: 4b4ebb15456af443347679a7e7e8726c090a5bf5
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.19; UI render: default; 
TinderBox: Win-x86_64@62-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2017-08-31_02:04:11
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI); Calc: group
Comment 6 Telesto 2017-08-31 19:32:55 UTC 
Created attachment 135916 [details]
Screenshot

(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #5)
> No repro (B1, that is).

Hmm; odd. The zoom level seems to make a difference. Could you please try it a different zoom levels?

Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 02c53f744ed23e2149fc7c83d67cb7d8aa5eb0ed
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.19; UI render: default; 
TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-08-24_05:48:55
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL
Comment 7 Buovjaga 2017-08-31 19:37:35 UTC 
(In reply to Telesto from comment #6)
> Hmm; odd. The zoom level seems to make a difference. Could you please try it
> a different zoom levels?

Tried it with 100, 110, 120. What zoom level was in that screenshot?
Comment 8 Telesto 2017-09-01 18:46:56 UTC 
Created attachment 135939 [details]
Screencast

(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #7)
> (In reply to Telesto from comment #6)
> > Hmm; odd. The zoom level seems to make a difference. Could you please try it
> > a different zoom levels?
> 
> Tried it with 100, 110, 120. What zoom level was in that screenshot?

You should have seen something in that range. I can also reproduce it with my Macbook
Comment 9 Telesto 2018-02-13 18:58:04 UTC 
No repro with 
Version: 6.1.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 8a0b61172a14b8b766a2e85f27762db3558d3af7
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3; UI render: default; 
TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2018-02-06_03:28:54
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL

The auto table style formatting seems to resolve this (I recreated to document). Was a minor glitch anyway.

Not 100% sure what the status should be without a conformation.
Comment 10 Buovjaga 2018-02-13 19:17:24 UTC 
(In reply to Telesto from comment #9)
> Not 100% sure what the status should be without a conformation.

WFM is correct