Created attachment 135480 [details]
CJK text shift slight in vertical direction. when you style it to underline, it's crossing out text.
Steps to Reproduce:
A. open attachment libreoffice_vertical_test.odt.
1) open attachment libreoffice_horizontal_test.odt.
2) Format -> Page -> Text direction -> Right-to-left (vertical).
underline cross out CJK text.
underline should not cross out text like Latin text.
Build ID: 7556cbc6811c9d992f4064ab9287069087d7f62c
CPU threads: 2; OS: Linux 4.11; UI render: default; VCL: gtk2;
Locale: zh-HK (en_GB.UTF-8); Calc: group
Created attachment 135481 [details]
Created attachment 135482 [details]
Created attachment 135516 [details]
Snapshot on Windows
I cannot reproduce on Windows.
I can reproduce it in
Build ID: ef2e6260fad38e26c8591ea88ded348db618270d
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.10; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3;
Locale: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8); Calc: group
and back to
@Mark, one for you ?
If we get support for 'base' table we will get better solution for this.
Mark Hung committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
tdf#111717 consider CJK vertical writing for underline offset
It will be available in 6.0.0.
The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
Created attachment 137938 [details]
Snapshot on Windows (2)
Here is what I have seen after above commit. Reproduced in:
Version: 22.214.171.124.alpha1+ (x64)
Build ID: a0ebba3d8855fee0bcec04a10137ae3a4f9f0e77
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: default;
TinderBox: Win-x86_64@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-11-22_05:59:17
Locale: zh-CN (zh_CN); Calc: group threaded
Your images shows that the underline no longer cross out the text. Is there any problem?
(In reply to Mark Hung from comment #8)
> Hi Volga,
> Your images shows that the underline no longer cross out the text. Is there
> any problem?
No, thanks. However another problem appearing to underline, see bug 114009.