There is major difference when displaying Microstoft Office 2013 Docx document, containing table. The table on the first page of attached document is displayed to the right in Libre 5.3 (correct placement, same as in MS Word), but it is displayed to the left in the Libre 5.4.
I have tested it in the following versions:
5.3.1 on Ubuntu - Build ID: 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 - from package manager
5.4.1 on Ubuntu - Version: 184.108.40.206 Build ID: ea7cb86e6eeb2bf3a5af73a8f7777ac570321527 - manual install from the website (https://www.libreoffice.org/)
5.3.6 on Windows 10x64 - LibreOffice_5.3.6_Win_x86.msi - manual install from the website (https://www.libreoffice.org/)
5.4.1 on Windows 10x64 - LibreOffice_5.4.1_Win_x86.msi - manual install from the website (https://www.libreoffice.org/)
The 5.3 version are working correctly. The versions 5.4 are displaying incorrect results.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open document Test-tezky.docx in Libre 5.3
2. Open document Test-tezky.docx in Libre 5.4
In Writer 5.4 table on the first page (containing Jan NOVAK, r. nar. 1900, etc.) is displayed on the left side.
In Writer 5.4 table on the first page (containing Jan NOVAK, r. nar. 1900, etc.) is displayed on the right side. (same as in MS Word and Libre 5.3)
User Profile Reset: No
Both testing OS are 64bit, and runnnig JRE 1.8.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:55.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/55.0
Created attachment 136420 [details]
Test document which shows the problem
Created attachment 136421 [details]
PDF conversions of the Test-tezky.docx in various version of Writer and Word
Regression introduced by:
author Miklos Vajna <email@example.com> 2017-05-16 13:26:53 (GMT)
committer Miklos Vajna <firstname.lastname@example.org> 2017-05-16 16:57:00 (GMT)
commit 659c0227a50d298780d72902314e03df8824bc06 (patch)
parent d849231dd2064ebed96d17bf54286a33954304ab (diff)
tdf#107889 DOCX import: consider page breaks for multi-page floattables
This is the DOCX equivalent of commit
6aba29576df7a2a40e54040d4dd09d94d6594741 (tdf#107773 DOC import:
consider page breaks for multi-page floattables, 2017-05-11): a specific
case where it's clearly superior to import a multi-page floating table
as a multi-page one, rather than a floating one.
Bisected with: bibisect-linux-64-5.4
Adding Cc: to Miklos Vajna
I think the root cause is bug 61594 here, where Writer does not have the floating multi-page table what Word has. This bug is just one more manifestation of that problem. No matter how hard to try to do heuristics to guess if the multi-page of the floating table mode of Writer will fit the situation best, somebody will be unhappy. The real solution will be the feature, which is the tracked at the bug I mentioned.
OK to close as duplicate?
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 61594 ***