Created attachment 136655 [details] Chart-sort-by-X-bug.ods From: Shannon Dealy <dealy@deatech.com> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: libreoffice-calc: Chart, x-y scatter with Sort by X values breaks with empty cells Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 10:49:37 +0200 Package: libreoffice-calc Version: 1:4.3.3-2+deb8u4 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I selected two columns of cells in a spreadsheet which had empty cells between the rows of data in these columns, however, a filter was turned on which displayed only the non-empty rows for these columns. I created an X-Y scatter plot with points and lines in calc, with the "Sort by X values" option and the chart was correctly created. Once the filter was turned off, displaying the empty cells, the points remained in the correct places, however, the order of the lines was rearranged so that the X sorting was no longer being correctly observed. I had naturally expected that the chart would not be affected by the filter being removed as only empty cells were added. Some experimentation has shown that it is not the filter, but some strange function of the number of empty cells between the rows that have data. With the filter turned off and just inserting and deleting empty rows I get different plots for the exact same data, given in the exact same order. I created a spreadsheet with nothing but the data being ploted and a chart and found that the order of the line plotting changed depending on the number of rows of empty cells between the different rows of data values. In other words, it does not just fail to sort the rows by the X value when there are empty cells, but the order it uses for the plot changes based on where and how many empty rows there are between the data values. The attached file can be used to demonstrate the bug. - Select "not empty" for the Y column filter and the chart will display correctly, sorted by the X values. - Change the filter selection so all rows display again. This will make the chart return to its original incorrect display - Now select cells B8 - C11 and delete them with the option to move cells up. The chart will now display incorrectly in a different manner, even though the data has not changed and remains in the same order, only empty cells have been removed. - Other changes to the number of rows of empty cells can result different versions of the wrong display. Regards, Shannon C. Dealy | DeaTech Research Inc. dealy@deatech.com | - Custom Software Development - Telephone: +1 541-929-4089 | - Natural Building Instruction - USA only: 800-467-5820 | www.deatech.com
Repro with document. Arch Linux 64-bit, KDE Plasma 5 Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: fff7097f1ed8493de099d79aa0613ea6b309100a CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.13; UI render: default; VCL: kde4; Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); Calc: group Built on November 2nd 2017 Arch Linux 64-bit LibreOffice 3.3.0 OOO330m19 (Build:6) tag libreoffice-3.3.0.4
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Reproduce with : Version: 6.0.6.2 (x64) Build ID: 0c292870b25a325b5ed35f6b45599d2ea4458e77 Threads CPU : 2; OS : Windows 6.1; UI Render : par défaut; Locale : fr-FR (fr_FR); Calc: group
Dear Stéphane Aulery, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I could reproduce this.