Description: UI: The content of table get shows up as selected, instead of the full table Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open the attached file 2. Press CTRL+A once (full table gets selected: how it should be) -> Cursor moves to the last cell 3. Press CTRL+A a second time (table content seems selected) & cursor is moving to the top of the table (probably not intended) 4. Try to select to full table from the embedded table (by pressing CTRL+A twice; same as step 3) Actual Results: Not everything is selected; only the content; looks a bit strange Expected Results: Everything should be fully selected Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Found in Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: c24c32bf71b8e64bd0d36e511f554e1f6c015842 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3; UI render: default; TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-11-22_23:15:41 Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0
Created attachment 138060 [details] Example file
The issue started with the commits for bug 37606. Fixed with bug 72486 (commit below), except for the problem here. author Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.co.uk> 2015-01-03 10:40:41 (GMT) committer Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.co.uk> 2015-01-03 12:09:26 (GMT) commit fa39e7970496537258eaad1f5351db2d675225b6 (patch) tree 1b90dadaed9d6941a5921e961c2a627d9eb02bfe parent b33cd811cb5456a146916ee374aaf1ce11b2031e (diff) fdo#72486 SwWrtShell::SelAll: if in table, then call extended select all ... ... only in case the whole table is already selected
1. Put cursor in embedded table 2. Press CTRL+A three times => whole table is selected So for me it seems to be only the point, that the running order is different. If you think this is worthy for a bug, I confirm it. In this case the bug summary should be reformulated.
(In reply to Dieter Praas from comment #3) > 1. Put cursor in embedded table > 2. Press CTRL+A three times => whole table is selected > > So for me it seems to be only the point, that the running order is > different. If you think this is worthy for a bug, I confirm it. In this case > the bug summary should be reformulated. Miklos: is this NOTABUG?
Buggy or not, I can imagine that if you just silently change the behavior so that the 3rd ctrl-a selects only the inner table, then somebody will file a regression bug for that. So perhaps NOTABUG is the best we can have.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.