Bug 115256 - FILESAVE: incorrect ruby text position in exported rtf file.
Summary: FILESAVE: incorrect ruby text position in exported rtf file.
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
5.0.0.5 release
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: Ruby
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2018-01-27 13:47 UTC by Mark Hung
Modified: 2023-01-31 03:22 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
Source file (17.00 KB, application/zip)
2018-01-27 13:48 UTC, Mark Hung
Details
Screenshot of MSOffice 2010 (27.82 KB, image/png)
2018-01-27 13:49 UTC, Mark Hung
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Mark Hung 2018-01-27 13:47:36 UTC
Description:
The ruby text lies in the middle of the base text when exporting to rtf file, when viewed from MS Office 2010 and One Drive.



Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open the attached document.
2.Save as the RTF file.
3.Open the file in MS Office.

Actual Results:  
The ruby text overlapped with the base text.

Expected Results:
The ruby text should lies above the base text as in Writer.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
Exporting ruby in rtf document documents is first implemented 
 in e2be23d1718b363650bf1853d629df89347d906e .

The size of the ruby text and the height it raised up is incorrect when converting from TWIPS to HPS ( Half point size ).


User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/63.0.3239.132 Safari/537.36
Comment 1 Mark Hung 2018-01-27 13:48:25 UTC
Created attachment 139391 [details]
Source file
Comment 2 Mark Hung 2018-01-27 13:49:22 UTC
Created attachment 139392 [details]
Screenshot of MSOffice 2010
Comment 3 QA Administrators 2019-01-30 03:41:44 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 4 QA Administrators 2021-01-30 04:17:02 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 5 QA Administrators 2023-01-31 03:22:33 UTC
Dear Mark Hung,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
 
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug