Bug 116162 - Very slow to open Cell format dialog in Calc 6.0.2.1 (French) on Windows 7 SP1
Summary: Very slow to open Cell format dialog in Calc 6.0.2.1 (French) on Windows 7 SP1
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 63551
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Calc (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
6.0.2.1 release
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) Windows (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2018-03-03 18:05 UTC by Kévin V
Modified: 2018-03-10 17:24 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kévin V 2018-03-03 18:05:27 UTC 
Description:
About Formatting cells
When I try to open "Format de cellule" dialog (I think it is "Cell format" in English, it is very slow to open (2 to 5 sec approx), at least on Windows 7 SP1 x64 (tested on 2 computers)



Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open a calc document, even empty
2.Select some cells
3.Right click and click on "Format de cellule" (in French, probably "Cell format" in English)


Actual Results:  
The dialog is slow to appear

Expected Results:
The dialog should open almost immediatly


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
Version: 6.0.2.1 (x64)
Build ID: f7f06a8f319e4b62f9bc5095aa112a65d2f3ac89
Threads CPU : 2; OS : Windows 6.1; UI Render : par défaut; 
Locale : fr-FR (fr_FR); Calc: group


User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:58.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/58.0
Comment 1 Telesto 2018-03-03 19:39:44 UTC 
Repro, but only the first time after launch:
Version: 6.1.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 96d551636e9179eb6874a5156b191ef3bff0a10c
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3; UI render: default; 
TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2018-02-26_23:44:46
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL
Comment 2 Buovjaga 2018-03-10 17:24:44 UTC 
Looks like it is related to fonts.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 63551 ***