Created attachment 143857 [details]
Example file

Regression introduced by:

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ba9b63d8101197d3fd8612193b1ca188271dfc1a

author	Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com>	2014-06-13 14:47:05 +0200
committer	Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com>	2014-06-13 15:27:02 +0200
commit ba9b63d8101197d3fd8612193b1ca188271dfc1a (patch)
tree 4ac56f3d9bbe6f1d54c6982fad3e7ef207ae5907
parent b7857e5cfe9d5d007785ae93e5505620fc8ed475 (diff)
fdo#76633: writerfilter: RTF import: do not leak the XShape of image

Bisected with: bibisect-44max

Adding Cc: to Michael Stahl

It seems the picture shape is treated as fake picture and it's content is ignored.

In RTF, shapeType is set to ESCHER_ShpInst_TextBox (202) and that value is taken when parsing \shppict and \pict and \picprop

{\shp 
    {\*\shpinst\shpwr2\shpwrk3\shpbypara\shpbyignore\shptop-1790\shpbottom1791\shpbxcolumn\shpbxignore\shpleft0\shpright4708
        {\sp{\sn shapeType}{\sv 202}}
        {\sp {\sn dxWrapDistLeft}{\sv 0}}
        {\sp {\sn dxWrapDistRight}{\sv 0}}
        {\sp {\sn dyWrapDistTop}{\sv 0}}
        {\sp {\sn dyWrapDistBottom}{\sv 0}}
        {\sp {\sn posrelv}{\sv 2}}
        {\sp {\sn posv}{\sv 2}}
        {\sp {\sn posrelh}{\sv 2}}
        {\sp {\sn dxTextLeft}{\sv 635}}
        {\sp {\sn dyTextTop}{\sv 635}}
        {\sp {\sn dxTextRight}{\sv 635}}
        {\sp {\sn dyTextBottom}{\sv 635}}
        {\shptxt\pgndec\s19\ql\nowidctlpar\hyphpar0\...   ...\sb120\sa120
            {\rtlch \ltrch\rtlch \ltrch
                {\*\shppict
                    {\pict
                        {\*\picprop
                            {\sp {\sn wzDescription}{\sv}}
                            {\sp {\sn wzName}{\sv}}
                        }
                    \picscalex75\\... ... \picw313\pich208\picwgoal6260\pichgoal4219\jpegblipffd8ffe000104a46494...
                    }
                }

*** Bug 135160 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Dear Telesto,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
 
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug