Quoting from bug 119543: (In reply to Diogo G. Sousa from comment #0) > Description: > Many emphasis animations don't do anything. Where is the list: > > 1. Change fill color > 2. Change line color > 3. Color blend > 4. Complementary color > 5. Complementary color 2 > 6. Contrasting color > 7. Darken > 8. Desaturate > 9. Lighten > 10. Blast (works only with hardware acceleration off) > 11. Blink > 12. Flicker (works only with hardware acceleration off) > 13. Teeter (works only with hardware acceleration off) At least 1-6 only make sense for LibreOffice shapes. 7-9 might be made to work in theory. 10-13 should work even for images, so brokenness is a bug.
Update with: Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: d2fa44db6f8a1badece63856ee0f12db4cba9b28 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded > 1. Change fill color Useful if using a raster image with transparency and an Area Fill > 2. Change line color Useful if Line property applied to image (i.e. a border/frame) > 3. Color blend > 4. Complementary color > 5. Complementary color 2 > 6. Contrasting color > 7. Darken > 8. Desaturate > 9. Lighten 3 to 9 all have an effect if there is text attached to the image > 10. Blast (works only with hardware acceleration off) > 11. Blink > 12. Flicker (works only with hardware acceleration off) > 13. Teeter (works only with hardware acceleration off) 10 to 13 all have an effect (be it only on text, or on whole picture), with hardware acceleration turned on. So I don't think there's a case for limiting the choice of animations here, and I am closing as "works for me". If there are issues remaining (and I'm sure there are some, as we're talking about animations!), or even if I missed something in there, let's open more specific, actionable reports. (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #0) > 7-9 might be made to work in theory. This makes perfect sense, I think it should be opened as a separate enhancement request.
Created attachment 192827 [details] test ODP with many animations on raster images
(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #1) > (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #0) > > 7-9 might be made to work in theory. > This makes perfect sense, I think it should be opened as a separate > enhancement request. Ah, kind of already tracked in bug 71169.