Description: Shape anchored to a paragraph in a frame is lost after saving to .doc format. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Insert a frame. 2. Insert a shape and anchored it to a paragraph in the frame. (Frame-Paragraph-Shape.odt, Frame-Paragraph-Shape.PNG) 3. Save the document into .doc format. (Frame-Paragraph-Shape.doc) 4. Open the .doc file with MS Word. (Frame-Paragraph-Shape-Export.PNG) Actual Results: The shape is disappeared. Expected Results: The shape remains in the frame. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info:
Created attachment 146730 [details] The original file saved by Writer
Created attachment 146731 [details] Example file from Writer – with the missing shape
Created attachment 146732 [details] Screenshot of the original document in Writer
Created attachment 146733 [details] Screenshot of the exported document in Word
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 121510 ***
This was reported as a dupe for DOC but let's convert to similar problem with DOCX. There are other reports where images, charts, shapes are lost when anchored to frames. Bug 64500, bug 67318, bug 49184, etc. I'm opening this one so that one is exclusively DOCX. Related to bug 121509.
*** Bug 135983 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I don't actually see a lost frame in Frame-Paragraph-Shape.odt (tested 7.2), but I do see it in the duplicate www (6) (2) (5).odt (tested 7.6)
As mentioned in bug 40540 comment 36, I can't reproduce this when saving attachment 146730 [details] or attachment 56207 [details] to DOCX: the object remains, it's just anchored to a paragraph on the page instead (and its position changes). I tested with LO 6.0.0.3 and a recent trunk build: Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 29b11fa3b5574dc3f42f55b0716f71054030c6c2 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Can anyone else reproduce the issue for DOCX export with attachment 146730 [details]? Like Justin, I can reproduce with the steps and document in bug 135983, but that's different: it's an object anchored inside a frame, which is itself anchored inside another frame. So I'd vote to mark this as duplicate of bug 40540, and setting bug 135983 back to new.
(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #9) > Like Justin, I can reproduce with the steps and document in bug 135983, but > that's different: it's an object anchored inside a frame, which is itself > anchored inside another frame. Yes and this should be overall phased out from the UI, since it's sooo un-interoperable :(. > So I'd vote to mark this as duplicate of bug > 40540, and setting bug 135983 back to new. Agree. For the doc case, saving this attachment is a duplicate, for docx it's a WFM. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 40540 ***