Description: Hello, In sheet "Graphics Solaire" the graph is an object but in sheet "Cumul Solaire" the graph is really a graph. You can see it in the object navigator. If I insert a graph in the sheet "Graphics Solaire" with the menu Insert > Graph..., an object is inserted, not a graph. ChartObjects.Count return 0 on sheet "Graphics Solaire" and 1 on sheet "Cumul Solaire". Regards, -- Stéphane Aulery Steps to Reproduce: In sheet "Graphics Solaire" the graph is an object but in sheet "Cumul Solaire" the graph is really a graph. You can see it in the object navigator. If I insert a graph in the sheet "Graphics Solaire" with the menu Insert > Graph..., an object is inserted, not a graph. ChartObjects.Count return 0 on sheet "Graphics Solaire" and 1 on sheet "Cumul Solaire". Actual Results: Graphics Solaire is not a graph Expected Results: Graphics Solaire must be a graph Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info:
Created attachment 151342 [details] debug_document_2.xslm
Created attachment 151343 [details] Relevé compteurs.xslm
Please explain what you're doing. What is the history of xslm you attached? Properties show you saved it in LO. It's important where it was created, in MSO or in LO. If in MSO, please attach original and write steps you made to save in LO. LO attachment is not needed. If in LO, we need a source ODS and a step to save as MS format. No mixes.
I'm not the original reporter. I haven't these information. I just do bug triage on Debian BTS. debug_document_2.xlsm is a reduction of Relevé_compteurs.xslm I made for easy debugging. If I have time I will do it...
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed
Set back to Needinfo.
Since requested info wasn't provided, I'll close. Feel free to set again Unconfirmed should you be able to attach source document and steps to show bug.
Are you kiding? I already give you all information I have and the documents attached reproduce the bug, even if I do not have the answer to your question. The documents dates from 2011. How would you like the reporter to know what he has done now (if he answers). All I understand is that the documents attached show the bug described still today (I have tested, twice). It's not my responsibility to do all the tests. I have already taken some time putting the debian information back to you and identifying 4 different errors and making a second, simpler document to better identify the problem: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125250 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125251 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125252 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125253 So make an effort and examine them, or say openly that essential information is missing and close the bug, or that you do not want to treat it (for X or Y reason) and take responsibility for what you say, but do not try to trample, do your homework... Thanks,