Description: When saving a new file to the XLSX file format, LO writes the following column record: <col collapsed="false" customWidth="false" hidden="false" outlineLevel="0" max="1025" min="1" style="0" width="11.52"/> "min" and "max" are 1-indexed and inclusive, so this describes columns A:AMK. LO currently supports 1024 columns so that column AMK is technically outside of the valid range. The following two records are equivalent to the one LO writes: <col collapsed="false" customWidth="false" hidden="false" outlineLevel="0" max="1024" min="1" style="0" width="11.52"/> <col collapsed="false" customWidth="false" hidden="false" outlineLevel="0" max="1025" min="1025" style="0" width="11.52"/> However, due to the column restriction, the latter elicits a warning. The fix is to write that col record with range up to 1024: <col collapsed="false" customWidth="false" hidden="false" outlineLevel="0" max="1024" min="1" style="0" width="11.52"/> Actual Results: LO-generated XLSX references column 1025 Expected Results: LO-generated XLSX should not reference unsupported columns Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: Yes Additional Info:
Thank you for reporting the bug. Please attach a sample document, as this makes it easier for us to verify the bug. (Please note that the attachment will be public, remove any sensitive information before attaching it. See https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FAQ#How_can_I_eliminate_confidential_data_from_a_sample_document.3F for help on how to do so.) I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' once the requested document is provided.
Created attachment 151917 [details] Example XLSX from LO
A file generated from LibreOffice was attached. The relevant segment is in the `cols` xml block from the `xl/worksheets/sheet1.xml` entry within the file: ```xml <cols> <col collapsed="false" customWidth="false" hidden="false" outlineLevel="0" max="1" min="1" style="0" width="11.52"/> <col collapsed="false" customWidth="true" hidden="false" outlineLevel="0" max="2" min="2" style="0" width="2.65"/> <col collapsed="false" customWidth="false" hidden="false" outlineLevel="0" max="1025" min="3" style="0" width="11.52"/> </cols> ``` The "max" field in the third col entry is "1025". That column maps to the name "AMK", which is beyond the AMJ max column that LibreOffice currently supports. As far as Excel is concerned, the previous block is equivalent to ``` <cols> <col collapsed="false" customWidth="false" hidden="false" outlineLevel="0" max="1" min="1" style="0" width="11.52"/> <col collapsed="false" customWidth="true" hidden="false" outlineLevel="0" max="2" min="2" style="0" width="2.65"/> <col collapsed="false" customWidth="false" hidden="false" outlineLevel="0" max="1024" min="3" style="0" width="11.52"/> <col collapsed="false" customWidth="false" hidden="false" outlineLevel="0" max="1025" min="1025" style="0" width="11.52"/> </cols> ``` But when you make that change (see second attachment) LibreOffice complains
Created attachment 151918 [details] Modified file with equivalent col structure
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed
This is apparently fixed, please test with 6.3.0
Dear SheetJS, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping
Dear SheetJS, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp