Description: https://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/211548/the-english-characters-are-recognized-as-asian-characters-unless-a-line-is-broken/ Steps to Reproduce: 1.Set the different fonts for Western characters and Asian characters Actual Results: English characters are recognized as Asian characters, thus English gets Asian font, unless at least one line is broken within a cell. Expected Results: Both Western and Asian characters get corresponding fonts properly regardless of whether at least one line is broken within a cell. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: Yes Additional Info: Info from "Help - About LibreOffice": https://i.imgur.com/r01OF27.png I have no idea what Hardware I should select but the Processor my PC have is Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500k CPU @ 3.30GHz 3.30 GHz; of course it is x64 based Processor. When I tried in Safe Mode, it gave me a different result surprisely, like it sometimes give characters proper fonts for one line cells, though the glitch itself is still occuring. Result video: https://i.imgur.com/HRrce4V.gifv Sample I used: https://ask.libreoffice.org/upfiles/1570338719562422.ods When I tired in normal mode right after that, it doesn't reproduce the results what I've gotten from Safe Mode, just as same as what happening in the link.
+ I found out that switching the "Automatic Spell Checking" does something interesting when I was reproducing the glitch in a completely new sheet just for a case of which I thought it could reproduce things that might be different with what I caused in the attached sheet, although the attached sheet does same thing with the said new sheet: https://i.imgur.com/c0ZPt7L.png
I believe this is the same bug as the one I reported in bug 126248.
(In reply to Ming Hua from comment #2) > I believe this is the same bug as the one I reported in bug 126248. I didn't notice that it was already reported.. I see both bug reports are about the identical bug I guess. Given this, I wouldn't mind if this bug report got closed or anything else.
(In reply to Slashy from comment #3) > (In reply to Ming Hua from comment #2) > > I believe this is the same bug as the one I reported in bug 126248. > > I didn't notice that it was already reported.. I see both bug reports are > about the identical bug I guess. > Given this, I wouldn't mind if this bug report got closed or anything else. That's alright, I'm just glad someone else is reporting the same problem I was having. Since my bug contains more infomration (Kunlong's bibisect work and so on), I'll mark your bug as a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 126248 ***