Description: Using a paragraph style with the insert page break before setting enabled, and the with page style and page number settings enabled results in an incorrect total page count. This result is visible in the page count in the UI, as well as when using the page count field in the document. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open a new blank document in Writer and enter two paragraphs of text. 2. Select the second paragraph, and open the Paragraph properties. 3. In the Text Flow tab under Breaks, enable the check boxes for "Insert", "With Page Style", and "Page number". Type is Page, Position is Before, Page Style is Default Style, and Page number is 1. (Page number check box is not present in LO 3.3.0) Actual Results: The page total count in the bottom left of the UI is now 3. Inserting Fields > Page Count also displays the count as 3. Expected Results: The page count should be 2. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No OpenGL enabled: Yes Additional Info: I have reproduced this in versions 3.3.0, 6.3.3.2, 6.5.0.0.alpha0. LibreOffice 3.3.0 OOO330m19 (Build:6) tag libreoffice-3.3.0.4 Version: 6.3.3.2 (x64) Build ID: a64200df03143b798afd1ec74a12ab50359878ed CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: GL; VCL: win; Locale: en-AU (en_AU); UI-Language: en-GB Calc: threaded Version: 6.5.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: d312d02cf43928361be34207a0cdd2d95b3ec5fd CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 18362; UI render: GL; VCL: win; Locale: en-AU (en_AU); UI-Language: en-GB Calc: CL
Created attachment 156114 [details] Test case demonstrating result The attached test case has all steps to reproduce the issue applied to it. This specific case was created and demonstrated issue in LO 6.3.3.2.
Mike, this is the intended behaviour, but perhaps documentation culd be improved. see bug 126284 cc: Oliver Hallot cc: Design-Team for decision, if we leave bug open, close it or change to docmentation
(In reply to Dieter Praas from comment #2) > cc: Design-Team for decision, if we leave bug open, close it or change to > docmentation Would make it a duplicate. But let's first see if Mike agrees => NEEDINFO
Apologies for the delay. Yes, that will be fine. Thank you for the explanation.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 126284 ***