Description: Lotus Word Pro 97 files with lwp extension opened no problem in LibreOffice 3.3.4 OOO330m19 (Build:401) tag libreoffice-3.3.4.1 from 04-Aug-2011 but trying to open them in LibreOffice_6.2.4_Win_x64 (win/ubuntu/manjaro) or 6.2.8.2 (manjaro) does does not work. Opening became erroneous in 4.4.7.2 (the tables were not displayed anymore), it was the same in LibreOffice 5.2.7.2 and finally in LibreOffice 6.2.5.2 I only get this error message: Error General Error. General input/output error. I have not tested every version, so the problem might have started in any version between 3.3.4 and 4.4.7.2. Can you please restore the LibreOffice3 behavior? attached some example files and how they looked in Lotus. Lotus invoice test.lwp - opens, but table vanished including it's contents, formatting changed Lotus testfile.lwp - General input/output error Lotus testfile - without table&columns.lwp - opens, but numbering,alignment,emphasis and color missing Lotus testfile - just without table.lwp - General input/output error Lotus testfile - just without columns.lwp - General input/output error related bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71147 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123815 Steps to Reproduce: 1. open file Actual Results: error opening file or missing elements/changed formatting Expected Results: Open the file without problems like in 3.3.4 Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info:
Created attachment 157138 [details] testfile (with table)
Created attachment 157140 [details] testfile2 (with table&columns)
Created attachment 157141 [details] testfile2 (without columns)
Created attachment 157142 [details] testfile2 (without table)
Created attachment 157143 [details] testfile2 (without table&columns)
Created attachment 157144 [details] testfile - correct look in LotusWordPro
Created attachment 157145 [details] testfile2 - correct look in LotusWordPro
Reproduced in Version: 6.5.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: fc1f85127968d1c2e0a53dace51bf8a78f9e6ca5 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded
but not in Version 4.1.0.0.alpha0+ (Build ID: efca6f15609322f62a35619619a6d5fe5c9bd5a)
General input/output error reported in bug 130093
Regression introduced by: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=e2080e70fe8b085f18e868e46340454720fa94ca author Noel Grandin <noel@peralex.com> 2014-06-18 12:14:29 +0200 committer Noel Grandin <noel@peralex.com> 2014-06-24 11:34:21 +0200 commit e2080e70fe8b085f18e868e46340454720fa94ca (patch) tree 4038d1d57b41b68a47d5ebbbe6ad390648ec6303 parent f910280b8704ed9c289150a4ca3c8d60e15d0d97 (diff) new compilerplugin returnbyref Bisected with: bibisect-44max Adding Cc: to Noel Grandin
Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/0b113d6ebbaf923e11ba576bed2691bb68e95ae6 tdf#129993 broken tables opening LWP file It will be available in 6.5.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
So, just to be clear here, the bisection in comment 11 was for attachment 157138 [details] The problem with attachment 157140 [details] can be also reproduced in Version 4.1.0.0.alpha0+ (Build ID: efca6f15609322f62a35619619a6d5fe5c9bd5a) So let's close this issue as RESOLVED FIXED and I'll create a follow-up bug for the second testfile. @Noel, thanks for fixing this issue. Verified in Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 447e4209fa16e765d9cba9f1c80bf10e8901204c CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded
Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "libreoffice-6-4": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/678e00d2251060b562f295a5fb3c0215b12c8042 tdf#129993 broken tables opening LWP file It will be available in 6.4.1. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "libreoffice-6-3": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/bada427464a8a23625497f99d0c3bca3b4d01a96 tdf#129993 broken tables opening LWP file It will be available in 6.3.6. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
Xisco Fauli committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/5a989074cd1f8afdc03d0ee4f2dc12b174f9aa19 tdf#129993: Add unittest It will be available in 7.0.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
Thank you very much for your hard work and sorry for the delay. Tested 6.4.0.3 7.0.0.0alpha+ Lotus invoice test.lwp opens, table missing opens, with table(!), some tabs in both lines of the header seem missing Lotus testfile.lwp General input/output error. opens, table missing Lotus testfile - just without columns.lwp General input/output error. opens, table missing Lotus testfile - just without table.lwp General input/output error. opens, columns missing Lotus testfile - without table&columns.lwp opens opens In every case, bold/cursive/subscript/superscript, text color, lists, columns and text adjustment are lost. Interestingly, underlining is lost only in Lotus testfile.lwp, but is retained in Lotus invoice test.lwp Tables are mostly lost, but retained in "Lotus invoice test.lwp" - that is 1 in 9 cases that I tested. Could you perhaps improve it so that the whole textual content is displayed regardless of formatting? Or could you display a warning when importing closed formats that content might have been lost upon import and encourage users to use the original program to export important documents to formats better suited for archival?
Can't seem to edit my post, so I'll try to fix the formatting here: Thank you very much for your hard work and sorry for the delay. Tested in 6.4.0.3 Lotus invoice test.lwp - opens, table missing Lotus testfile.lwp - General input/output error. Lotus testfile - just without columns.lwp - General input/output error. Lotus testfile - just without table.lwp - General input/output error. Lotus testfile - without table&columns.lwp - opens Tested in 7.0.0.0alpha+ Lotus invoice test.lwp - opens, with table(!), some tabs in both lines of the header seem missing Lotus testfile.lwp - opens, table missing Lotus testfile - just without columns.lwp - opens, table missing Lotus testfile - just without table.lwp - opens, columns missing Lotus testfile - without table&columns.lwp - opens In every case, bold/cursive/subscript/superscript, text color, lists, columns and text adjustment are lost. Interestingly, underlining is lost only in Lotus testfile.lwp, but is retained in Lotus invoice test.lwp Tables are mostly lost, but retained in "Lotus invoice test.lwp" - that is 1 in 9 cases that I tested. Could you perhaps improve it so that the whole textual content is displayed regardless of formatting? Or could you display a warning when importing closed formats that content might have been lost upon import and encourage users to use the original program to export important documents to formats better suited for archival?
Hi cvagl455@t-online.de, Could you please check if those issues has been already reported? you can search for LWP bugs, there aren't many. if you don't find any similar issue, please create a new report. This one was about the missing table, which is fixed now Thanks