Created attachment 158664 [details] A sample cross reference field Steps: in the attachment, right-click on the "Figure 1" field in "See Figure 1" line, and select "Edit Fields...". See that "Insert reference to" box has "Page" selected, while actual mode is "Category and Number". OK in Version: 6.1.5.2 (x64) Build ID: 90f8dcf33c87b3705e78202e3df5142b201bd805 CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: GL; Locale: ru-RU (ru_RU); Calc: group threaded Bad in Version: 6.4.2.1 (x64) Build ID: c92dba0b4728c0ec26c4b83e2c0fbf3284425375 CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 18363; UI render: GL; VCL: win; Locale: ru-RU (ru_RU); UI-Language: en-US Calc: CL
I confirm it with Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: c63148ba139bd6b9ae7a0f9e24e51f29e5370963 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 18363; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win; Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI-Language: en-GB Calc: threaded
cannot confirm with Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: a11c10a83f6fceae6cfb519725d06f8eaf1013fb CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3;
I can't reproduce it in Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 4ee7ee1c4a515479bc174543af4dbc400035c0ba CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: x11; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded
Is it possible, that it is only Windows?
I can't reproduce it in Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: 59b755eb93136ea28916e875ee28a50ac7c12fb5 CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win; Locale: en-GB (en_GB); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded
Not reproducible in Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: ec85ed21a960a198a01778cdb89a91fabcb5d0c0 CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win; Locale: en-GB (en_GB); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded either
Not reproducible in Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: bc898e2c2784e36ad4d4cdf6d962e39069d2c82d CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win; Locale: en-GB (en_GB); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded
Yes, WORKSFORME. Thanks!
But is it fixed in upcomung 6.4.3? (it is still broken in 6.4.2.2)