Created attachment 159148 [details] Comparison MSO 2010 and LibreOffice 7.0 master Steps to reproduce: 1. Open attachment 82588 [details] from bug 67038 2. Go to page two and check the image and the text around -> See comparison image Reproduced in Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 11e6582b23b983fde4b04ece5b37c546bcd98a43 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded [Bug found by office-interoperability-tools]
Regression introduced by: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=1052acae9a599c54e518c8fc17d6a994d8778757 author Justin Luth <justin.luth@collabora.com> 2020-02-26 13:15:53 +0300 committer Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com> 2020-03-05 10:01:19 +0100 commit 1052acae9a599c54e518c8fc17d6a994d8778757 (patch) tree ff5a096000cf625cb0223789afc976861d9c1424 parent bef317ec9d00beb70d6b59c2af3b61ef2544b4a5 (diff) tdf#119748 sw layout: ConsiderTextWrap on initial positioning Bisected with: bibisect-linux64-6.5 Adding Cc: to Justin Luth
Same issue reproduced wit attachment 94056 [details] from bug 74970
Created attachment 159154 [details] Comparison MSO 2010 and LibreOffice 7.0 master - file 2
Using jmux's fix instead, at https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/91420
Justin Luth committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/f497d1dc27b4fee3db1e2228647a00971922eb5f tdf#131707 sw layout try2: ConsiderTextWrap on positioning It will be available in 7.0.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
Verified in Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 24e1563b5db3de5abac0d4fd0f737ec319e703e8 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded @Justin, thanks for fixing this issue!!
Jmux's version of the fix in comment 5 also triggered at least one bug report (bug 133709), so I had intended to revert it, but that was rejected. Since the current regression is minor in nature, I'll go along with it, but I won't make any attempt to fix any future fallout from this.