Bug 132415 - Multiple-page view: Page layout is wrong for text behind image with page wrap optimal on
Summary: Multiple-page view: Page layout is wrong for text behind image with page wrap...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
Inherited From OOo
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: Anchor-and-Text-Wrap Multi-Page-View
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2020-04-25 19:58 UTC by Telesto
Modified: 2022-08-20 03:44 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:
Regression By:


Attachments
Example file (456.07 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2020-04-25 19:58 UTC, Telesto
Details
Demonstration (456.08 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2020-04-25 20:02 UTC, Telesto
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Telesto 2020-04-25 19:58:33 UTC
Description:
Page layout off/ should be 4 for pages

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open the attached file
2. Image on page 3 is overlapping text with optimal text wrap on

Actual Results:
Image on page 3 is overlapping text

Expected Results:
Same as LibreOffice 3.0


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
Found in
Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: 951b6a9570ae2665f7b6e7cdd6d24d1fc513ba90
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win; 
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI-Language: en-US
Calc: CL

but not in
LibreOffice 3.3.0 
OOO330m19 (Build:6)
tag libreoffice-3.3.0.4
Comment 1 Telesto 2020-04-25 19:58:45 UTC
Created attachment 159934 [details]
Example file
Comment 2 Telesto 2020-04-25 20:02:05 UTC
Created attachment 159935 [details]
Demonstration

1. Open the attached file
2. Select the image
3. Drag the anchor to page 4
4. Result -> Example file
Comment 3 Timur 2020-06-04 20:23:59 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 4 Telesto 2020-06-04 21:05:51 UTC
(In reply to Timur from comment #3)
> No repro 4.3. Then 4.4 and 5.0 missing text. Repro 5.2 and 7.1+. Regression.
> Needs 2 bibisects.

Select the image and move it a little in older versions.. and result will be the same.. already seen in 4.0 oldest
Comment 5 Timur 2020-06-08 08:31:00 UTC
(In reply to Timur from comment #3)
> No repro 4.3. Then 4.4 and 5.0 missing text. Repro 5.2 and 7.1+. Regression.
> Needs 2 bibisects.

Above test was in Windows, just opening file. 

But try to bibisect in Linux with 4.4 showed it's not that simple, same version opens differently. Looks like it depends on zoom. 
For example, 50% zoom opens 3 pages (wrong) in 4.4 oldest, same as latest. 75% zoom opens differently in oldest, 3 or 4 pages (wrong or correct). 

Going back to OO 3.3, it will mostly open fine, but not always, so this looks Inherited. 

Also in master 7.1+, 75% zoom opens differently.
Comment 6 Timur 2020-06-08 08:38:41 UTC
Looks like the key issue here is multipage view. If file (even wrong with 3 pages) is saved with single page (100% or 75%), it opens fine after that.
Comment 7 Timur 2020-06-08 08:41:53 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 8 Justin L 2020-08-19 18:53:23 UTC
(In reply to Timur from comment #7)
> *** Bug 133709 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Sorry, I missed noticing this duplicate marking earlier. Can you explain why - since this inherited bug is referencing a 7.0 regression?

I'm trying to decide whether I do go ahead and revert the identified commit in bug 133709 as I originally intended, or whether I just wash my hands of it and let it stay. Would reverting help this bug in any way, or hurt it even more.
Comment 9 Telesto 2020-08-19 18:57:31 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 10 QA Administrators 2022-08-20 03:44:07 UTC
Dear Telesto,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
 
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug