Created attachment 160098 [details] Sample PPTX document Receiving the original deck including of this slide I noticed that this particular slide looked very oddly. Investigating with Office 365 I realized there is an effect labeled "beveled oval" that we are missing.
Created attachment 160099 [details] How it should look like (Office 365)
Created attachment 160100 [details] This is how it looks in LO right now
Created attachment 160101 [details] This is how it looks like in 365's user interface
Reproduced in Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 70479e1f4cb3c120f46239a648e65f035af2922d CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
The issue is visible since https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=f4ba484183a1e7b9824f10580d633466c266828f when the images started to be displayed as circle. before that, they were displayed as squares. @Tamas Bunth, i thought you might be interested in this issue...
Created attachment 166999 [details] Sample compared MSO LO There was change in LO 7.0 (bad to bad). Seen in comparison here. In MSO I see this as Shadow - Perspective: Below. There are more bugs on shadows, if this is not a duplicate, similar should be put in See Also.
There were 2 changes in 7.0. 1st change: commit 658e68588fd4ade17837026b28d9c2efd0898a27 Date: Thu Apr 23 22:38:27 2020 +0200 source 6454b6336b8de9a4c5899adeab552af6f794cdc4 previous source 0e75f025419f878dc772391cea8d55765bceb9fc author Gülsah Köse <gulsah.kose@collabora.com> 2020-04-14 15:49:28 +0300 committer Gülsah Köse <gulsah.kose@collabora.com> 2020-04-23 10:07:13 +0200 commit 6454b6336b8de9a4c5899adeab552af6f794cdc4 (patch) tree efe9ea2e9b0131c4e9143cb1a085586de6f6e91a parent 0e75f025419f878dc772391cea8d55765bceb9fc (diff) tdf#130058 Import shadow size. 2nd change (same as in 7.1+: de9c98af030cd9adcaac32fc4229af708e1386b9 is the first bad commit commit de9c98af030cd9adcaac32fc4229af708e1386b9 Date: Sat May 9 06:09:07 2020 +0200 source 4259509aa4f11cbcd63299bd17a4503ebdc22fc0 previous source 88173bd3ca4becc59282e58c035b882ca827a753 More commits: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range&q=88173bd3ca4becc59282e58c035b882ca827a753..4259509aa4f11cbcd63299bd17a4503ebdc22fc0 This one mentions shadow: author Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com> 2020-05-08 16:43:22 +0200 committer Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com> 2020-05-08 21:00:12 +0200 commit e2b0e614e1185c960b3015414919f69a1ed35aa0 (patch) tree c4416c9047ba30bbd89c0fa09f3d2e177d7eaa2b parent c35aef260feda34eae5e4b8a39f1baaa716b717d (diff) Related: tdf#129916 svx: improve shadow size of custom shapes
Gerald, these are all your bugs. Please follow and test with more complete sample, including all effects. It's pointless to go around like this.
in master, it looks much better after https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ccdee8eebaa56619248e35001017226eecfe4e83 author Gülşah Köse <gulsah.kose@collabora.com> 2021-02-01 17:03:33 +0300 committer Gülşah Köse <gulsah.kose@collabora.com> 2021-02-10 07:04:38 +0100 commit ccdee8eebaa56619248e35001017226eecfe4e83 (patch) tree 708db8ed2f0e37e9709b553b4a04de6c51a60aab parent e4e0cf825a858e82c299c55632b03ca6f80647d1 (diff) tdf#134210 Import crop position of bitmap filled shape. The only problem left is the shadow, which is above, and not below
Created attachment 171434 [details] Comparison MSO 2010 and LibreOffice 7.2 master
Still reproducible in Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha1+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 754eb1541a6ca709f78afbc7fb2b75f626562dcc CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.10; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: es-ES (es_ES.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
Created attachment 181323 [details] Sample PPTX with different Sizes
Created attachment 181324 [details] Sample PPTX with different Sizes compared in MSO 2016 and LO 7.5+
Hi Gülsah. Since you already operated in a shadow .. please see :)
This actually looks fine now with Version: 25.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 97833217ebacd77d01b8e06ee1eb05cc06c17afc CPU threads: 12; OS: Linux 6.9; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US except bug #161724 (a recent regression) hits and one of the two images is completely gone. Should we close this one and just leave bug #161724 open?