Issue found by https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/93316 Steps to reproduce: 1. Open sw/qa/extras/ww8export/data/fdo66304-1.odt 2. Save it as DOC 3. Reopen the new file -> Number of pages is 31 instead of 2 Reproduced in Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: d8c77a54cebdbb60006aa2391ad75e9d6fd0444b CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded and back to Version 4.1.0.0.alpha0+ (Build ID: efca6f15609322f62a35619619a6d5fe5c9bd5a)
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #0) > Issue found by https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/93316 > > Steps to reproduce: > 1. Open sw/qa/extras/ww8export/data/fdo66304-1.odt Sorry, but don't know how to do this. I've found https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/16468/2/sw/qa/extras/ww8export/data/fdo66304-1.odt but AFAIK, it's not a odt-file, but html-file.
Created attachment 162121 [details] sample file
Repro. 3.3.0 ends up with 21 pages, 3.5.0 with 8. Arch Linux 64-bit Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 9b34dc20b6946698ae6ce2d5d859885bfb444633 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.8; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Built on 16 October 2020
This ODT actually is 30 pages of deleted content - visible when you View - Show tracked changes.
repro 24.2+ - I only tested DOCX export. But actually, it is mostly OK for DOCX. Just a few extra paragraphs relating to page style breaks - and that isn't too surprising since MSO doesn't have page styles, so a lot of emulation is needed, and somehow all that information needs to be retained in case the change is rejected. So extremely low priority.
Dear Xisco Faulí, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug