Description: Table splits differently after click the footnote line. Somewhat similar to bug 128437 (and duplicates) Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open the attached file 2. Click on the empty area above the footnote line on page 1. Table splits differently Actual Results: Different table split Expected Results: Stable layout Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: 97a2c1fc5e376c0c00968f17a0392c6d3a5ed565 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win; Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded
Created attachment 160557 [details] Example file
Created attachment 164878 [details] Second example 1. Open the file (22 pages) 2. Notice the odd page split on page 2 3. Click on the second page on the bottom cell (different layout (20 pages) 4. Select cell A1 5. CTRL+A 6. CTRL+X 7. CTRL+V -> 19 pages
(In reply to Telesto from comment #0) > Description: > Table splits differently after click the footnote line. Somewhat similar to > bug > 128437 (and duplicates) > > Steps to Reproduce: > 1. Open the attached file > 2. Click on the empty area above the footnote line on page 1. Table splits > differently I can't confirm that with Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha1+ (x64) Build ID: f27c4ec5c864395f4cdaec32d7e95ff24e4f43c8 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19042; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-GB Calc: threaded
(In reply to Telesto from comment #2) > Created attachment 164878 [details] > Second example > > 1. Open the file (22 pages) > 2. Notice the odd page split on page 2 > 3. Click on the second page on the bottom cell (different layout (20 pages) I confirm the different layout (from second example), but I get 19 pages (so I can't confirm step 4 - 7) > 4. Select cell A1 > 5. CTRL+A > 6. CTRL+X > 7. CTRL+V -> 19 pages Telesto, you have one bug report, with two different examples and two different steps. That's confusing. So could you please narrow it down to one problem? => NEEDINFO Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha1+ (x64) Build ID: f27c4ec5c864395f4cdaec32d7e95ff24e4f43c8 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19042; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-GB Calc: threaded
Created attachment 167343 [details] Screencast Screencast for comment 0
Also in LibreOffice 3.5.0rc3 Build ID: 7e68ba2-a744ebf-1f241b7-c506db1-7d53735
@Michael This document exhibits something having the potential of causing a table loop behaviour, IMHO. Only intended to point to mere presence/ being aware. FWIW. Not unique similar bug seen in 6.2 but bibisected to some commit of yours; likely exposing something older
Thnaks for the screencast. I could reproduce it with Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha1+ (x64) Build ID: f27c4ec5c864395f4cdaec32d7e95ff24e4f43c8 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19042; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-GB Calc: threaded
Retested Also in Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 2f4f4cbeb8e50081d607b86b0475b93971c40ab8 CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 5.13; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: ro-RO (ro_RO.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
Still an issue in Version: 7.5.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: cfc8a8f5d841b3f84d207196153be67da7f60652 CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 5.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: hu-HU (hu_HU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded despite similar bug 143121 being fixed recently.
Dear Telesto, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug