Created attachment 161549 [details] A screenshot presenting the problem Version: 7.0.0.0.beta1 Build ID: 94f789cbb33335b4a511c319542c7bdc31ff3b3c Subprocs. CPU: 8; SO: Linux 4.12; Repres. IU: predet.; VCL: kf5 Locale: es-ES (es_ES.UTF-8); Interfaz: es-ES Calc: threaded [Note: the "version" field in bugzilla do not offer the beta1 for 7.0] As you can see from the screenshot, numerical controls do not refresh when changing their values, and successive numbers "accumulate" one on top of the others, blurring the field content. Minimizing / maximizing forces a refresh, fixing the problem momentarily. The problem is not present with GTK3 VCL plug-in, only with the kf5 one and only in 7.0 beta: version 6.4 works as intended.
Thanks for reporting this issue. Could you please try to reproduce it with a master build from http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/ ? You can install it alongside the standard version. I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' if the bug is still present in the master build
It seems to work well with Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: a3c8ea5e644ca2fc04de9f01ba9f8ace47f520f0 Subprocs. CPU: 8; SO: Linux 4.12; Repres. IU: predet.; VCL: kf5 Locale: es-ES (es_ES.UTF-8); Interfaz: es-ES TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@86-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2020-06-17_02:21:20 Calc: threaded Downloaded from http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/ That build declares itself as "alpha0+" while there are beta 1 versions available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/rpm/x86_64/ (though the time stamp is older). Is that Ok?
(In reply to RGB from comment #2) > It seems to work well with > > Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ > Build ID: a3c8ea5e644ca2fc04de9f01ba9f8ace47f520f0 > Subprocs. CPU: 8; SO: Linux 4.12; Repres. IU: predet.; VCL: kf5 > Locale: es-ES (es_ES.UTF-8); Interfaz: es-ES > TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@86-TDF, Branch:master, Time: > 2020-06-17_02:21:20 > Calc: threaded > > Downloaded from http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/ > > That build declares itself as "alpha0+" while there are beta 1 versions > available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/rpm/x86_64/ > (though the time stamp is older). Is that Ok? Yes, you tested LibreOffice 7.1 alpha0 while the beta1 is for LibreOffice 7.0. Thanks for testing it with a master build. Closing as RESOLVED WORKSFORME