Created attachment 162739 [details] Example file Description: Using libreoffice document to open the common domain test document (doc), Abnormal row spacing. Steps to Reproduce: 1.Using libreoffice document to open the common domaintest document (docx) 2.Abnormal row spacing Actual Results: Open the document, Abnormal row spacing Expected Results: Row spacing should remain the same Reproducible: Always Additional Info: Version Infomation Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: 4c14c88cc681abab787a461a1bea502a777f37e6 CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 18363; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: zh-CN (zh_CN); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
Created attachment 162740 [details] Difference comparison of row spacing
Reproduced in Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 12bfedfac3b141fe6c91b0e5ae5b3fb2ba817c48 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
also reproduced in Version: 6.1.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: 3a801799536e6870f2fb111b1cc00b9575a35a39 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: group but not in Version: 5.4.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: 9feb7f7039a3b59974cbf266922177e961a52dd1 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: group
The bibisecting of this report is reserved for new QA team members in training. Bibisecting should be done using the win32-6.1 repo.
This seems to have begun at the below commit. Adding Cc: to Mike Kaganski ; Could you possibly take a look at this one? Thanks b021e0f87b4b6f75c2aaff1088522525618c17b5 is the first bad commit commit b021e0f87b4b6f75c2aaff1088522525618c17b5 Author: Jenkins Build User <tdf@pollux.tdf> Date: Tue Apr 3 10:02:16 2018 +0200 source b9955b2083ffdc1f99bc8be6b09d806fa3279a16 author Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com> 2018-04-02 08:54:59 +0100 committer Katarina Behrens <Katarina.Behrens@cib.de> 2018-04-03 09:43:56 +0200 commit b9955b2083ffdc1f99bc8be6b09d806fa3279a16 (patch) tree 8deabb3c56c55833392d8454feac519740caaafd parent 14198f2191f216592f00b72221771704b3ce4636 (diff) tdf#93173: Remove arbitrary line spacing limit
Not truly a regression. The line spacing now is correct (for line "项目名称：" in page 1, it's 300% in LO 7.0.1.2, matching MS Word's "Multiple - 3"). But there seems to be some specifics with Word's handling of this paragraph (or maybe my en-US MS Office doesn't show me some of the properties there ... something like LO doesn't show some properties when Asian language support is not activated)?
I agree with Mike that this likely is not a regression. Something font related?
Dear NSO LibreOffice Team, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug