Download it now!
Bug 134949 - FILESAVE/OPEN: Layout changes after file & reload (related to anchoring)
Summary: FILESAVE/OPEN: Layout changes after file & reload (related to anchoring)
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
(earliest affected) release
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
Keywords: bibisectRequest, regression
Depends on:
Reported: 2020-07-19 10:47 UTC by Telesto
Modified: 2020-10-24 05:14 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Example file (236.64 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2020-07-19 10:50 UTC, Telesto

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Telesto 2020-07-19 10:47:48 UTC
FILESAVE/OPEN: Layout changes after file & reload (related to anchoring)d

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open the attached file
2. Select the blue rectangle
3. Delete
4. Save
5. Reload 

Actual Results:
Yellow marked words are on the first page after deletion but on the second after file reload

Expected Results:
Screen results = file open result

Reproducible: Always

User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
Version: (x64)
Build ID: 52820b52b3bca45e2db527d1cc5f4488b2e0b9d0
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: default; VCL: win
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI: en-US
Calc: CL
Comment 1 Telesto 2020-07-19 10:50:09 UTC
Also with 5.3 with old engine

but not with
Build ID: 3d5603e1122f0f102b62521720ab13a38a4e0eb0
CPU Threads: 4; Versie besturingssysteem:Windows 6.2; UI Render: standaard; 
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL
Comment 2 Telesto 2020-07-19 10:50:28 UTC
Created attachment 163263 [details]
Example file
Comment 3 Dieter 2020-10-23 14:51:26 UTC
I confirm the observed behaviour with

Version: (x64)
Build ID: 8349ace3c3162073abd90d81fd06dcfb6b36b994
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19042; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: he-IL (de_DE); UI: en-GB
Calc: threaded

but I can't assess, if this is a bug or not. For me result after reload is correct result, because footnotes an page one now correspondend with footnote anchors on page one. I don't know, why this isn't the case in the original document.